Help talk:Advanced editing: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::Well, as I said, if and when newer codes are brought up and implemented, this is going to undergo a lot of evolution anyways. So, at some point, this mage may well be missing something "Major" as you put it, but that's to be expected, in my opinion. Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 09:35, 1 June 2014 (EDT) | ::Well, as I said, if and when newer codes are brought up and implemented, this is going to undergo a lot of evolution anyways. So, at some point, this mage may well be missing something "Major" as you put it, but that's to be expected, in my opinion. Score[[Special:Contributions/ScoreCounter|C]]o[[User:ScoreCounter|u]]n[[User Talk:ScoreCounter|t]]er 09:35, 1 June 2014 (EDT) | ||
:::Agreed. Toomai, if any amendments are needed they can be added. Otherwise this is a good start. I say pass. [[User:RoyboyX|<font color="red">'''Roy'''</font><font color="gray">'''boy'''</font><font color="darkred">'''X'''</font>]] [[User talk:RoyboyX|''<span style="color:brown;">'''Talk'''</span>'']] 20:06, 5 June 2014 (EDT) | :::Agreed. Toomai, if any amendments are needed they can be added. Otherwise this is a good start. I say pass. [[User:RoyboyX|<font color="red">'''Roy'''</font><font color="gray">'''boy'''</font><font color="darkred">'''X'''</font>]] [[User talk:RoyboyX|''<span style="color:brown;">'''Talk'''</span>'']] 20:06, 5 June 2014 (EDT) | ||
::::One week passed, let's make this a page now.[[User:Qwerty|<font face="sand" color="purple">Qwerty</font>]] [[User talk:Qwerty|<font face="sand" color="silver">the</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Qwerty|<font face="sand" color="red">lord</font>]] [[File:Nessytrewq.jpg|16px]] 00:00, 7 June 2014 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 23:00, June 6, 2014
- Support all the way Could easily be really really helpful to many users, and is definitely necessary to have if we have guidelines on basic editing too. Scr7(talk · contribs) 17:02, 26 May 2014 (EDT)
- Strong Support This can help users, as it covers a lot of info a contributor may need. I have no objections. Berrenta (talk) 17:15, 26 May 2014 (EDT)
- Strong support RoyboyX Talk 17:34, 26 May 2014 (EDT)
- Strong support My idea, Toomai created it for me.Qwerty the lord 18:55, 26 May 2014 (EDT)
- Strong Support As long as people are aware that this will need changing and growing every once in awhile. ScoreCounter 13:46, 27 May 2014 (EDT)
- Absolute support This is definitely need for any user. Dots (talk) The N64 15:05, 30 May 2014 (EDT)
- Strong Support Provides more features of editing. ZeldaStarfoxfan2164 (talk) is made in America 17:47, 31 May 2014 (EDT)
Okay, I think this can pass. Admins? RoyboyX Talk 23:09, 30 May 2014 (EDT)
- Before this gets passed, I want to make sure there's nothing major it's lacking; bring such things up. Toomai Glittershine The Bold 00:23, 31 May 2014 (EDT)
- How about in a week if no opposition, we can have it pass. Dots (talk) The Planet 11:40, 31 May 2014 (EDT)
- That sort of plan does not address whether or not the advanced editing page lacks something. Speaking of which, how does the #<INSERT COMMAND> thing function? I've only seen it being used for #redirect, and if the #<COMMAND> is actually used for other things, then it should definitely be mentioned for advanced editing. MegaTron1XD 20:04, 31 May 2014 (EDT)
- #REDIRECT is unique; nothing else aside from lists and parser functions use the number sign at all. Toomai Glittershine The Superlative 09:41, 1 June 2014 (EDT)
- That sort of plan does not address whether or not the advanced editing page lacks something. Speaking of which, how does the #<INSERT COMMAND> thing function? I've only seen it being used for #redirect, and if the #<COMMAND> is actually used for other things, then it should definitely be mentioned for advanced editing. MegaTron1XD 20:04, 31 May 2014 (EDT)
- Well, as I said, if and when newer codes are brought up and implemented, this is going to undergo a lot of evolution anyways. So, at some point, this mage may well be missing something "Major" as you put it, but that's to be expected, in my opinion. ScoreCounter 09:35, 1 June 2014 (EDT)
- How about in a week if no opposition, we can have it pass. Dots (talk) The Planet 11:40, 31 May 2014 (EDT)