Talk:Professional smasher

The tables

I think Sir Teatei Moonlight has a point. The tables on this page don't serve much of a purpose in my opinion; that's what categories and such are for, and it would have to be basically changed constantly to mirror all the smasher pages we have. Bad idea. Toomai Glittershine The Pan-Galactic 20:48, 3 February 2012 (EST)

^Agree with Toomai. Mousehunter321 (talk · contributions) 22:24, 3 February 2012 (EST)

One way I think this page should be cleaned up; it should only list the recognised top players of each character only. Listing the professionals of each character is what the character categories such as Fox professionals are for, not this page. Omega Tyrant 22:53, 3 February 2012 (EST)

Bump Omega Tyrant 19:34, 5 February 2012 (EST)

^Agreed to OT and Toomai. ..... The Neutral 20:14, 5 February 2012 (EST)

What is meant by "recognised top players"? --- ReiDemon, Author Extraordinaire, 16:37, 16 February 2012 (EST)

The players seen as the best. What else would it mean? Omega Tyrant 16:50, 16 February 2012 (EST)

The definition seems dicey at best; would it be community consensus on the SWF forum or similar areas that consider some players to be the best of a specific character? --- ReiDemon, Author Extraordinaire, 17:03, 16 February 2012 (EST)

General observation from what people have said, observation of tournament performance, and if someone believes another player is more notable than one on here, it can always be discussed here. Omega Tyrant 17:09, 16 February 2012 (EST)

Get rid of the Character sections

I think we should get rid of the List of professionals by character section; we have the Professionals category and more importantly the Notable players section on each character article. Awesome Cardinal 2000 21:56, 8 October 2013 (EDT)

Adding a stub template

I really think we should add a stub template in this article as this has little information on it, anybody agrees? Ness da best! (talk) 08:43, 13 May 2014 (EDT)