Talk:Glire

Merge

• Massive Oppose. These should most certainly be separate. {My name is Miles, and I approve this message.} 15:03, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
• I support in principle, but am opposed because there's no central thing that we know of. What would we call the conglomeration? Glire/Glice/Glunder? There's nothing to really merge them to. --Shadowcrest 15:09, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
• If more can be added, keep separate. If nothing else is going to be contributed to the pages, merge. Silverdragon706/FyreNWater - (T • User:Peakprovince/PPsigontributions/Silverdragon706|C]] ) 20:10, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose One) what would the the new page be named "Gl"? Two) We shouldn't merge something just because they're similar. It's like merging Fludd and water gun.
• I think they should either be put on a same page that responds to glire, glire, and glunder searches or be put in a category.-Peakprovince
• Yes, but redirects can't subsitute for a page name. It has to have a common name. Until there is a common name, I kinda have to vote Slight Oppose Kperfekt722 These Rules Are Stupid 23:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
• Oppose. If we merge these, what are we going to call it? Glire/Glunder/Glice? Kopaka251 (talk) 03:38, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
• Mild oppose. While I would personally put them all together, they do all have distinct names and Trophy data. Perhaps a link on each page to the remaining two would work out. - Gargomon251 (talk) 08:16, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
• Strong Oppose WaluigiIsAwesome (talk) 18:35, 27 March 2009 (UTC)