Cheap: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Removing extra space)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- THIS IS SUBJECTIVE, THEREFORE WE WILL NOT LIST EXAMPLES. All examples will be REMOVED. Repeat offenders will face punishment. -->
<!-- THIS IS SUBJECTIVE, THEREFORE WE WILL NOT LIST EXAMPLES. All examples will be REMOVED. Repeat offenders will face punishment. -->
'''Cheap''' is a word that has been used to complain about almost any aspect of a game.<ref>[http://www.sirlin.net/articles/playing-to-win-part-1.html "Cheap" in ''Playing to Win''], by David Sirlin, First Edition, 2006.</ref> Because of this, it has no clear meaning. The closest definition is "a strategy that someone can not figure out how to beat" or "a strategy that is seen as unfair or in poor sportsmanship". However, there is usually no rule against these tactics in tournaments because they are subjective. Many times, players [[John|cry cheap]] about any style that prevents them from performing their top moves or even just prevents them from winning. To date, there are no tactics or characters banned in the [[Super Smash Bros. series]] simply for being "cheap". Tactics that truly are so "cheap" that they completely destroy the game are considered [[broken]].
'''Cheap''' is a word that has been used to complain about almost any aspect of a game.<ref>[http://www.sirlin.net/articles/playing-to-win-part-1.html "Cheap" in ''Playing to Win''], by David Sirlin, First Edition, 2006.</ref> Because of this, it has no clear meaning. Possible definitions include:
*A strategy that someone cannot figure out how to beat
*A strategy that is seen as unfair or in poor sportsmanship
*A strategy that produces equal success compared to a more complex/difficult strategy, requiring less effort (or "cheaper" effort) to reach the same success
 
As the concept of cheapness is subjective, there are usually no rules preventing them in tournament play - if a tactic is strong enough to be banned, it is typically regarded as being [[broken]] instead of cheap.


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 17:29, May 30, 2011

Cheap is a word that has been used to complain about almost any aspect of a game.[1] Because of this, it has no clear meaning. Possible definitions include:

  • A strategy that someone cannot figure out how to beat
  • A strategy that is seen as unfair or in poor sportsmanship
  • A strategy that produces equal success compared to a more complex/difficult strategy, requiring less effort (or "cheaper" effort) to reach the same success

As the concept of cheapness is subjective, there are usually no rules preventing them in tournament play - if a tactic is strong enough to be banned, it is typically regarded as being broken instead of cheap.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Cheap" in Playing to Win, by David Sirlin, First Edition, 2006.