Cheap: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
SuperHamster (talk | contribs) m (Removing extra space) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!-- THIS IS SUBJECTIVE, THEREFORE WE WILL NOT LIST EXAMPLES. All examples will be REMOVED. Repeat offenders will face punishment. --> | <!-- THIS IS SUBJECTIVE, THEREFORE WE WILL NOT LIST EXAMPLES. All examples will be REMOVED. Repeat offenders will face punishment. --> | ||
'''Cheap''' is a word that has been used to complain about almost any aspect of a game.<ref>[http://www.sirlin.net/articles/playing-to-win-part-1.html "Cheap" in ''Playing to Win''], by David Sirlin, First Edition, 2006.</ref> Because of this, it has no clear meaning. | '''Cheap''' is a word that has been used to complain about almost any aspect of a game.<ref>[http://www.sirlin.net/articles/playing-to-win-part-1.html "Cheap" in ''Playing to Win''], by David Sirlin, First Edition, 2006.</ref> Because of this, it has no clear meaning. Possible definitions include: | ||
*A strategy that someone cannot figure out how to beat | |||
*A strategy that is seen as unfair or in poor sportsmanship | |||
*A strategy that produces equal success compared to a more complex/difficult strategy, requiring less effort (or "cheaper" effort) to reach the same success | |||
As the concept of cheapness is subjective, there are usually no rules preventing them in tournament play - if a tactic is strong enough to be banned, it is typically regarded as being [[broken]] instead of cheap. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== |
Revision as of 17:29, May 30, 2011
Cheap is a word that has been used to complain about almost any aspect of a game.[1] Because of this, it has no clear meaning. Possible definitions include:
- A strategy that someone cannot figure out how to beat
- A strategy that is seen as unfair or in poor sportsmanship
- A strategy that produces equal success compared to a more complex/difficult strategy, requiring less effort (or "cheaper" effort) to reach the same success
As the concept of cheapness is subjective, there are usually no rules preventing them in tournament play - if a tactic is strong enough to be banned, it is typically regarded as being broken instead of cheap.
See also
References
- ^ "Cheap" in Playing to Win, by David Sirlin, First Edition, 2006.