Talk:Nolimar: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Deletion: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Granted, it might need some overhaul, but it could work.--[[User:Meta-K|Meta-Kirb]] ([[User talk:Meta-K|talk]]) 01:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC) | Granted, it might need some overhaul, but it could work.--[[User:Meta-K|Meta-Kirb]] ([[User talk:Meta-K|talk]]) 01:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Meh, I think this'd be good for [[Category:Unofficial lingo]], but not much else. Solimar's pretty much just as legit as [[sandbagging]] IMO. [[User:Shade487z|<font color="red">Shade</font>]][[User talk:Shade487z|<font color="black">487</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Shade487z|<font color="yellow">z</font>]] 23:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Deletion == | == Deletion == | ||
So what's the consensus? Is this a valid page or should it be deleted? [[Image:SDFnW_SmashWiki_sig.gif]] - <small>([[User:Silverdragon706|U]] • [[User talk:Silverdragon706|T]] • [[Special:Contributions/Silverdragon706|C]] )</small> 21:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | So what's the consensus? Is this a valid page or should it be deleted? [[Image:SDFnW_SmashWiki_sig.gif]] - <small>([[User:Silverdragon706|U]] • [[User talk:Silverdragon706|T]] • [[Special:Contributions/Silverdragon706|C]] )</small> 21:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:17, February 27, 2009
This page seems like a vandal page. Friedbeef1 Ho ho ho! 23:23, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Actually, I'd say it's legitimate. See here [1]. I was actually going to do an article for the series.--Meta-Kirb (talk) 01:16, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Granted, it might need some overhaul, but it could work.--Meta-Kirb (talk) 01:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Meh, I think this'd be good for, but not much else. Solimar's pretty much just as legit as sandbagging IMO. Shade487z 23:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Deletion
So what's the consensus? Is this a valid page or should it be deleted? - (U • T • C ) 21:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)