SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Pikamander2 (2): Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Pikamander2 (talk | contribs) |
Shadowcrest (talk | contribs) m (fixing formatting) |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
==== Neutral ==== | ==== Neutral ==== | ||
*''...'' | *''...'' | ||
---- |
Revision as of 12:14, November 15, 2008
Pikamander2 (talk • contribs • edit count • RFA page)
On June 11, 2008, I requested adminship. Sixteen days later, I had five supports and three neutral votes, but SySop nominations were closed due to "an overflow in nominations." I am now requesting adminship once again.
Here are some reasons why I believe that I should become a SySop:
- I contribute to the wiki nearly every day.
- I never use foul language, on regular or talk pages.
- I don't melt or get angry under pressure.
- I have never been blocked.
- I have made over 2,000 edits to the main namespace since July 20, 2007, the day that I joined SmashWiki.
- I revert vandalism very frequently. If I was an administrator, I could ban troublesome IPs and delete joke/spam pages instantly.
- I have a colorful signature.
So, what does everyone think? --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 00:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Support
- Strong support, you do a lot for this wiki and you are very active. You deserve it. Im Alex25, K? (talk) 00:23, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Strong support. you've been a great influence and help to this wiki, and you're often funny and serious at the same time. Xtrme Talk 2 X Wut X is doing 00:37, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Massive support. Ridiculous numbers of mainspace edits, rollback'r status acheived, even-tempered and anti-vandal... every reason says yes. Miles (talk - contribs) 00:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support. So far, Pikamander is one of the few users here I've seen that "gets" wiki. I have moderate trust in his abilities not to fail, which- combined with little comparable opposition- has led me to support. --Shadowcrest 15:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Support. I supported this man the first time he ran for adminship, and I still do. Integrity, experience, work, he's got everything an admin should have. - GalaxiaD (talk) 22:36, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support The only thing keeping my vote from strong support is slightly low activity. He deserves my vote just from edit count alone. Cheezperson {talk}stuff 23:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Support This dude is like an admin even as a regular user. His contributions are superb as well. He has my vote. Blue Ninjakoopa Talk to me 11:30, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yes. No reason why not.O, Mighty Smoreking 00:29, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Support There is no reason whatsoever for Pika to fail this. Great editing, deals with people nicely, and helpful contributions says it all. METEORITE (t) 23:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
- ...
Neutral
- ...