Talk:Infinite Dimensional Cape: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[User:MetaXzero|MetaXzero]] ([[User talk:MetaXzero|talk]]) 17:46, 14 January 2009 (UTC)== Technique name? ==
17:46, 14 January 2009 (UTC)== Technique name? ==
It is not really an  infinite. It's just an extended one. Maybe "Extended Dimensional Cape" is a better name? - [[User:Timothyung|Timothyung]] ([[User talk:Timothyung|talk]]) 06:13, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
It is not really an  infinite. It's just an extended one. Maybe "Extended Dimensional Cape" is a better name? - [[User:Timothyung|Timothyung]] ([[User talk:Timothyung|talk]]) 06:13, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
:It lacks an official name besides this, but It CAN be done infinitely. It goes as long as the person can maintain it.
:It lacks an official name besides this, but It CAN be done infinitely. It goes as long as the person can maintain it.
Line 7: Line 7:


IDC was banned due to it being a powerful stall and the inability to tell stalling from simply using it. Claims of it being a broken approach/defense are unsubstantiated. Keep your facts straight.
IDC was banned due to it being a powerful stall and the inability to tell stalling from simply using it. Claims of it being a broken approach/defense are unsubstantiated. Keep your facts straight.
--MetaXzero

Revision as of 12:47, January 14, 2009

17:46, 14 January 2009 (UTC)== Technique name? == It is not really an infinite. It's just an extended one. Maybe "Extended Dimensional Cape" is a better name? - Timothyung (talk) 06:13, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

It lacks an official name besides this, but It CAN be done infinitely. It goes as long as the person can maintain it.
Obviously, the move is not truly infinite, but it is a good and catchy name which get's the point across. Zixor (talk) 09:24, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Subject of IDCs banning

IDC was banned due to it being a powerful stall and the inability to tell stalling from simply using it. Claims of it being a broken approach/defense are unsubstantiated. Keep your facts straight.

--MetaXzero