16,406
edits
Forum:Obsoletion policy: Difference between revisions
m
Failing proposal
(→Oppose) |
Omega Tyrant (talk | contribs) m (Failing proposal) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{forumheader|Proposals}}<!-- Please put your content below this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> | {{forumheader|Proposals}}<!-- Please put your content below this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes: ~~~~ --> | ||
{{Proposal}} | {{Proposal|failed|2=Only met with significant opposition and no support after a week, while no valid use case for this new template was provided. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[File: TyranitarMS.png ]] 21:54, June 13, 2023 (EDT)}} | ||
Hi, I’m proposing a new policy regarding use of the {{t|Obsolete}} template. What makes me propose this policy is that the conditions change depending on the namespace. Good obsoletion candidates include: | Hi, I’m proposing a new policy regarding use of the {{t|Obsolete}} template. What makes me propose this policy is that the conditions change depending on the namespace. Good obsoletion candidates include: | ||
*Pages or sections that include obsolete information (e.g. outdated information that could not be possibly updated). | *Pages or sections that include obsolete information (e.g. outdated information that could not be possibly updated). | ||