Talk:Passive armor: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
(→current table is kinda hard to parse: response) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
i think the table would be easier to parse and read if it had a column per character per game instead of using multiple in game icons in the same cell. either that or making a table per character that has passive armor. | i think the table would be easier to parse and read if it had a column per character per game instead of using multiple in game icons in the same cell. either that or making a table per character that has passive armor. | ||
that said if a new passive armor that isn't knockback based or straight up super armor is added down the line, then a different table for this one would be worth considering since the list of moves it could armor would end up being vastly different.—-[[User:Lattie|Lattie]] ([[User talk:Lattie|talk]]) 16:28, September 20, 2021 (EDT) | that said if a new passive armor that isn't knockback based or straight up super armor is added down the line, then a different table for this one would be worth considering since the list of moves it could armor would end up being vastly different.—-[[User:Lattie|Lattie]] ([[User talk:Lattie|talk]]) 16:28, September 20, 2021 (EDT) | ||
:I think the current table is fine. The small amount of instances makes it very difficult to work with in any other way; surely we don't want tables with like two articles? I'm not sure. If you can draw up something more effective, by all means edit the page, as that's what it's there for. --[[File:PlagueSigImage.png|20px]][[User:Plague von Karma|<span style="color: #e68;">'''Plague'''</span>]][[User talk:Plague von Karma|<span style="color: #e68;">''' von Karma'''</span>]][[File:PlagueSigImage.png|20px]] 16:49, September 20, 2021 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:49, September 20, 2021
current table is kinda hard to parse
i think the table would be easier to parse and read if it had a column per character per game instead of using multiple in game icons in the same cell. either that or making a table per character that has passive armor. that said if a new passive armor that isn't knockback based or straight up super armor is added down the line, then a different table for this one would be worth considering since the list of moves it could armor would end up being vastly different.—-Lattie (talk) 16:28, September 20, 2021 (EDT)
- I think the current table is fine. The small amount of instances makes it very difficult to work with in any other way; surely we don't want tables with like two articles? I'm not sure. If you can draw up something more effective, by all means edit the page, as that's what it's there for. --
Plague von Karma 16:49, September 20, 2021 (EDT)
