Tournament talk:CLOCKWORK VERSUS TOURNAMENT: Difference between revisions
MemeDedede (talk | contribs) Tag: Mobile edit |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
'''Oppose''': I feel like most of the wifi-tournaments needs to have much higher expectations of notability. Most pages involving wifi have over 300 entrants and/or notable players, with multiple PGR/WWR ranked players competing with their typical characters. Having just two notable players and a mere 128 entrants doesn’t feel very competitive (or notable for that matter). | '''Oppose''': I feel like most of the wifi-tournaments needs to have much higher expectations of notability. Most pages involving wifi have over 300 entrants and/or notable players, with multiple PGR/WWR ranked players competing with their typical characters. Having just two notable players and a mere 128 entrants doesn’t feel very competitive (or notable for that matter). | ||
[[Lag Spike: Ultimate New Year]] had 400+ entrants and multiple PGR/WWR players (BestNess, Spargo, Sword, Bloom4Eva) competing. There were way more than just “2 strong top players and 2 strong wifi players”. Clockwork vs. just pales in comparison. [[User:MemeDedede|MemeDedede]] ([[User talk:MemeDedede|talk]]) 23:17, June 29, 2020 (EDT)MemeDedede | [[Lag Spike: Ultimate New Year]] had 400+ entrants and multiple PGR/WWR players (BestNess, Spargo, Sword, Bloom4Eva) competing. There were way more than just “2 strong top players and 2 strong wifi players”. Clockwork vs. just pales in comparison. [[User:MemeDedede|MemeDedede]] ([[User talk:MemeDedede|talk]]) 23:17, June 29, 2020 (EDT)MemeDedede | ||
'''Oppose'''. Was going to stay neutral but, after noticing that the article creator is also someone in the top 8 of the tournament, it seems as more of a vanity page or a show-off to say, "Hey guys I finally made it on SmashWiki!" rather than a real, informative page. Also the fact that it has 128 entrants (which, at this point in time during COVID, it isn't an outstanding amount of entrants for a Wifi tournament) diminishes it's value on the site. <span style="font-family: Georgia;color: black;">alhecks</span>[[Image:{{NameToIcon|Pikachu}}Head{{#if:Blue|Blue}}{{#if:SSBU|{{#ifeq:SSBU|SSB4|SSB4-U|SSBU}}}}.png{{#if:20px|{{!}}20px}}|link={{#if:|{{{l}}}|Pikachu{{#if:SSBU| ({{#switch:SSBU|SSB4-U|SSB4-3=SSB4|#default=SSBU}})}}}}]] 16:23, June 30, 2020 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:24, June 30, 2020
Notability
Neutral. I have seen 2 strong top players and 2 strong Wi-Fi players in the tourney, but there is also "Señor H" (Grand Dad), a player that was previously deleted due to lack of notability, so there might be more players with little notability. Therefore, I am skeptical about this. 
NPM🐷 Morr!? 
20:43, June 29, 2020 (EDT)
- I am also pretty neutral about this, and I tagged this mainly to bring some discussion to it since I'm between deletion and keeping the article for the same reasons above. Perhaps there can be a stronger case for both sides. Cookies
Creme 20:46, June 29, 2020 (EDT)
Oppose: I feel like most of the wifi-tournaments needs to have much higher expectations of notability. Most pages involving wifi have over 300 entrants and/or notable players, with multiple PGR/WWR ranked players competing with their typical characters. Having just two notable players and a mere 128 entrants doesn’t feel very competitive (or notable for that matter). Lag Spike: Ultimate New Year had 400+ entrants and multiple PGR/WWR players (BestNess, Spargo, Sword, Bloom4Eva) competing. There were way more than just “2 strong top players and 2 strong wifi players”. Clockwork vs. just pales in comparison. MemeDedede (talk) 23:17, June 29, 2020 (EDT)MemeDedede
Oppose. Was going to stay neutral but, after noticing that the article creator is also someone in the top 8 of the tournament, it seems as more of a vanity page or a show-off to say, "Hey guys I finally made it on SmashWiki!" rather than a real, informative page. Also the fact that it has 128 entrants (which, at this point in time during COVID, it isn't an outstanding amount of entrants for a Wifi tournament) diminishes it's value on the site. alhecks
16:23, June 30, 2020 (EDT)
