Tournament talk:CLOCKWORK VERSUS TOURNAMENT: Difference between revisions
MemeDedede (talk | contribs) Tag: Mobile edit |
MemeDedede (talk | contribs) Tag: Mobile edit |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I am also pretty '''neutral''' about this, and I tagged this mainly to bring some discussion to it since I'm between deletion and keeping the article for the same reasons above. Perhaps there can be a stronger case for both sides. [[User:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia;color: black;">Cookies</span>]][[File:CnC Signature.png|20px]][[User talk:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia; color: black;">Creme</span>]] 20:46, June 29, 2020 (EDT) | :I am also pretty '''neutral''' about this, and I tagged this mainly to bring some discussion to it since I'm between deletion and keeping the article for the same reasons above. Perhaps there can be a stronger case for both sides. [[User:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia;color: black;">Cookies</span>]][[File:CnC Signature.png|20px]][[User talk:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia; color: black;">Creme</span>]] 20:46, June 29, 2020 (EDT) | ||
'''Oppose''': I feel like most of the wifi-tournaments needs to have much higher expectations of notability. Most pages involving wifi have over 300 entrants and/or notable players, with multiple PGR/WWR ranked players competing with their typical characters. Having just two notable players and a mere 128 entrants doesn’t feel very competitive (or notable for that matter). | '''Oppose''': I feel like most of the wifi-tournaments needs to have much higher expectations of notability. Most pages involving wifi have over 300 entrants and/or notable players, with multiple PGR/WWR ranked players competing with their typical characters. Having just two notable players and a mere 128 entrants doesn’t feel very competitive (or notable for that matter). | ||
[[Lag Spike: Ultimate New Year]] had 400+ entrants and multiple players (BestNess, Spargo, Sword, Bloom4Eva) competing. Clockwork vs. just pales in comparison. | [[Lag Spike: Ultimate New Year]] had 400+ entrants and multiple PGR/WWR players (BestNess, Spargo, Sword, Bloom4Eva) competing. There were way more than just “2 strong top players and 2 strong wifi players”. Clockwork vs. just pales in comparison. [[User:MemeDedede|MemeDedede]] ([[User talk:MemeDedede|talk]]) 23:17, June 29, 2020 (EDT)MemeDedede | ||
Revision as of 22:17, June 29, 2020
Notability
Neutral. I have seen 2 strong top players and 2 strong Wi-Fi players in the tourney, but there is also "Señor H" (Grand Dad), a player that was previously deleted due to lack of notability, so there might be more players with little notability. Therefore, I am skeptical about this. 
NPM🐷 Morr!? 
20:43, June 29, 2020 (EDT)
- I am also pretty neutral about this, and I tagged this mainly to bring some discussion to it since I'm between deletion and keeping the article for the same reasons above. Perhaps there can be a stronger case for both sides. Cookies
Creme 20:46, June 29, 2020 (EDT)
Oppose: I feel like most of the wifi-tournaments needs to have much higher expectations of notability. Most pages involving wifi have over 300 entrants and/or notable players, with multiple PGR/WWR ranked players competing with their typical characters. Having just two notable players and a mere 128 entrants doesn’t feel very competitive (or notable for that matter). Lag Spike: Ultimate New Year had 400+ entrants and multiple PGR/WWR players (BestNess, Spargo, Sword, Bloom4Eva) competing. There were way more than just “2 strong top players and 2 strong wifi players”. Clockwork vs. just pales in comparison. MemeDedede (talk) 23:17, June 29, 2020 (EDT)MemeDedede
