Talk:Short hop laser: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
sorry about that, I was unaware. I just did it because I saw the abbreviated version in terminolgy, and figured I'd make an article about it. Also, I didn't know about the no abbrev. thing.--[[User:Respawn|Respawn]] 21:48, November 3, 2006 (GMT) | sorry about that, I was unaware. I just did it because I saw the abbreviated version in terminolgy, and figured I'd make an article about it. Also, I didn't know about the no abbrev. thing.--[[User:Respawn|Respawn]] 21:48, November 3, 2006 (GMT) | ||
about the blaster vs. laser thing...shouldnt w make the article title what is ''correct'' and make what is more commonly used into the redirects?--[[User:OMNIVECTOR|Simna ibn Sind]] 22:47, November 3, 2006 (GMT) |
Revision as of 17:47, November 3, 2006
Moved "shl/shb" to "short hop laser," and turned "short hop blaster" into a redirect for this article. We shouldn't used abbreviations are article titles and nobody is ever going to search "shl/shb" to find what they're looking for. Better to have a fully descriptive title page.
Also, I believe short hop laser is used more commonly than short hop blaster; thus I made this the article and turned "short hop blaster" into a redirect. If any of you disagrees, voice it in this talk. --MaskedMarth 19:48, November 3, 2006 (GMT)
sorry about that, I was unaware. I just did it because I saw the abbreviated version in terminolgy, and figured I'd make an article about it. Also, I didn't know about the no abbrev. thing.--Respawn 21:48, November 3, 2006 (GMT)
about the blaster vs. laser thing...shouldnt w make the article title what is correct and make what is more commonly used into the redirects?--Simna ibn Sind 22:47, November 3, 2006 (GMT)