Talk:Spring 2019 PGRU: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Will we be adding X-Factor adjusted rankings, as has been done with the past PGRs back in Smash 4? [[User:ElusiveTranscendent|ElusiveTranscendent]] ([[User talk:ElusiveTranscendent|talk]]) 14:58, August 2, 2019 (EDT) | Will we be adding X-Factor adjusted rankings, as has been done with the past PGRs back in Smash 4? [[User:ElusiveTranscendent|ElusiveTranscendent]] ([[User talk:ElusiveTranscendent|talk]]) 14:58, August 2, 2019 (EDT) | ||
I'm going to point out that the names on the X-factor ballot DO NOT necessarily mean those players were in the top 100. In the past rankings, the PGStats team has said they have put red herrings in the X-factor list, as many as 28 names one season. There's no doubt a majority of the names listed were top 100, but it seems to me a mirepresentation to name them all as top 100 when that was NEVER confirmed to be the case. | I'm going to point out that the names on the X-factor ballot DO NOT necessarily mean those players were in the top 100. In the past rankings, the PGStats team has said they have put red herrings in the X-factor list, as many as 28 names one season. There's no doubt a majority of the names listed were top 100, but it seems to me a mirepresentation to name them all as top 100 when that was NEVER confirmed to be the case. I would recommend changing that section. | ||
Revision as of 11:27, August 23, 2019
X-Factor
Will we be adding X-Factor adjusted rankings, as has been done with the past PGRs back in Smash 4? ElusiveTranscendent (talk) 14:58, August 2, 2019 (EDT)
I'm going to point out that the names on the X-factor ballot DO NOT necessarily mean those players were in the top 100. In the past rankings, the PGStats team has said they have put red herrings in the X-factor list, as many as 28 names one season. There's no doubt a majority of the names listed were top 100, but it seems to me a mirepresentation to name them all as top 100 when that was NEVER confirmed to be the case. I would recommend changing that section.
