Smasher talk:Player J: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Deletion) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:[[SmashWiki:Ownership|Just because a person wants a page gone doesn't mean it should be gone]]. And if the reason is "personal information" (which I imagine amounts to the photo and the name, which CAN be removed per policy)......why not just remove those? - [[User:EndGenuity|EndGenuity]] ([[User talk:EndGenuity|talk]]) 18:16, April 29, 2019 (EDT) | :[[SmashWiki:Ownership|Just because a person wants a page gone doesn't mean it should be gone]]. And if the reason is "personal information" (which I imagine amounts to the photo and the name, which CAN be removed per policy)......why not just remove those? - [[User:EndGenuity|EndGenuity]] ([[User talk:EndGenuity|talk]]) 18:16, April 29, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::Exactly. Generally, I would believe respecting their wishes for more serious matters should have some leeway, but in this case, simply removing those edits and deleting its edit history should work. [[User:SugarCookie420|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman"><span style="color: red;">SugarCookie</span></span>]] [[User talk:SugarCookie420|<span style="font-family:Impact"><span style="color: green;">420</span></span>]] 18:24, April 29, 2019 (EDT) | ::Exactly. Generally, I would believe respecting their wishes for more serious matters should have some leeway, but in this case, simply removing those edits and deleting its edit history should work. [[User:SugarCookie420|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman"><span style="color: red;">SugarCookie</span></span>]] [[User talk:SugarCookie420|<span style="font-family:Impact"><span style="color: green;">420</span></span>]] 18:24, April 29, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::: Alright, I apologize for the confusion I have cause, I should have just reverted and moved on. Thank you all so much for your help. | |||
Revision as of 17:25, April 29, 2019
Deletion
This deletion was initially made by a anon user, who replaced the entire page with nothing, citing personal information as the reason. Should this page be deleted, or restored back to where it was before? CMWAidanx? Yikes. (talk) 16:42, April 29, 2019 (EDT)
- Just because a person wants a page gone doesn't mean it should be gone. And if the reason is "personal information" (which I imagine amounts to the photo and the name, which CAN be removed per policy)......why not just remove those? - EndGenuity (talk) 18:16, April 29, 2019 (EDT)
- Exactly. Generally, I would believe respecting their wishes for more serious matters should have some leeway, but in this case, simply removing those edits and deleting its edit history should work. SugarCookie 420 18:24, April 29, 2019 (EDT)
- Alright, I apologize for the confusion I have cause, I should have just reverted and moved on. Thank you all so much for your help.
- Exactly. Generally, I would believe respecting their wishes for more serious matters should have some leeway, but in this case, simply removing those edits and deleting its edit history should work. SugarCookie 420 18:24, April 29, 2019 (EDT)
