Talk:Curse of Weegee glitch: Difference between revisions
(→Deletion?: new section) |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
I think this page shouldn't be deleted because a glitch can lead to some funny moments. It may also be read by somebody who wants to replicate the glitch. At the very least, merging this with the other glitch pages to create one page focusing on glitches only could work well.[[User:Zormego|Zormego]] ([[User talk:Zormego|talk]]) 21:00, 17 November 2018 (EST) | I think this page shouldn't be deleted because a glitch can lead to some funny moments. It may also be read by somebody who wants to replicate the glitch. At the very least, merging this with the other glitch pages to create one page focusing on glitches only could work well.[[User:Zormego|Zormego]] ([[User talk:Zormego|talk]]) 21:00, 17 November 2018 (EST) | ||
:The merging option would probably be preferable, but the proposal for a "list of glitches" hasn't reached consensus. The deletion tag is too pre-emptive, honestly; as it stands, if this article were deleted, it would be removal of information without any relocation, which isn't desirable. I think I will remove the tag, because at this time there's no reason to delete this article. [[User:Dr. HyperCake|Dr. HyperCake]] ([[User talk:Dr. HyperCake|talk]]) 21:22, 17 November 2018 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:24, November 17, 2018
Video[edit]
Can someone get a better quality video? Silverdragon706/FyreNWater - (T • C ) 03:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Or even a video at all? 25T16 
Talk to me! 13:55, 31 July 2011 (EDT)
Is it even a glitch?[edit]
The conveyor belt is pushing "weegee" against the wall, but the wall's pushing back, so the landing animation is being repeated. I've had this happen to me on several stages, but they were escapable.Smoreking(T) (c) 16:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
escapable[edit]
you actually CAN escape he glitch i'm Valehd the smashbro pro!(talk) 21:02, 4 February 2015 (EST)
- It's possible. Smashworker101 (talk) 21:38, 4 February 2015 (EST)
Deletion?[edit]
I think this page shouldn't be deleted because a glitch can lead to some funny moments. It may also be read by somebody who wants to replicate the glitch. At the very least, merging this with the other glitch pages to create one page focusing on glitches only could work well.Zormego (talk) 21:00, 17 November 2018 (EST)
- The merging option would probably be preferable, but the proposal for a "list of glitches" hasn't reached consensus. The deletion tag is too pre-emptive, honestly; as it stands, if this article were deleted, it would be removal of information without any relocation, which isn't desirable. I think I will remove the tag, because at this time there's no reason to delete this article. Dr. HyperCake (talk) 21:22, 17 November 2018 (EST)
