User talk:Black Vulpine/Archive 2

current talk page

Archive

1. 1

NOTE: For discussing placement and usage of Black Vulpine art, please use this talk page.

The IP

Honestly, I wouldn't get involved. AFAIK, even if it was Nutta, this was outside of SmashWiki and its Discord server, and we're not supposed to be dragging off-wiki drama here. Disaster Flare (talk) 19:05, 13 August 2017 (EDT)

That explains why I didn't see anything then, because I've been reading every single message on the server. Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the Internets go! :3 19:57, 13 August 2017 (EDT)

Why I think the IP is Nutty

Judging by your comments in the edit summaries, I think you think the IP is fake. Well, if he was, then I doubt the IP would know about the...interesting topic between nutta and beep. Penro 06:47, 28 August 2017 (EDT)

I do think it's nutta, but I have to treat it like it's not. Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the Internets go! :3 08:40, 28 August 2017 (EDT)

Reminder about rollback

Reminder: Rollback is to be used only against vandalism.

Please stop using it to edit war. I understand that these are cases of simple removal of information, but continually rolling back these edits and doing nothing else is going to solve jack. Serpent King 22:45, 15 October 2017 (EDT)

I'd like to point out that I started doing that because I have seen others, including you, doing it. Nonetheless, I will try to stop it. Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the Internets go! :3 22:49, 15 October 2017 (EDT)

Umm not quite. I roll back obvious abusive removal of information, which is basically the same as vandalism. There's a difference. Aside from that, the main point I am trying to get at here is that by rolling back these edits, the point is clearly not getting across. Talk page contact may be necessary, because what I personally think is going on is that wangera himself is trying to remove his real name, which is fine...as long as he were to explain what he was doing. Which may be a little difficult for him because he's Japanese. Serpent King 22:53, 15 October 2017 (EDT)

Just saying this quickly (although I probably don't need to, but I'd also like to see if you do in fact have an explanation for this), but your most recent rollback was used on what was not a bad faith edit. Rollback also shouldn't be used simply to bring a page back to an old revision that undo can't be used for, instead you should directly edit said old revision (and not change anything), and it will bring the page back to that revision. Alex Parpotta the flying lobster! 16:04, 23 November 2017 (EST)

You call that quick? Anyway, I did mean to undo, but through a slip of the thumb, I hit rollback instead. Given how ridiculous the edit was, and the fact that it was supposed to be removed anyway, I could not be bothered to fix the rollback mistake so I just left it. Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the Internets go! :3 17:03, 23 November 2017 (EST)

Umm, you also seemed to misuse rollback on that recent IP. Those edits clearly were not bad faith in any way, just grammer mistakes. --Penro 19:10, 16 December 2017 (EST)

You don’t know the whole story. The IP is actually a person who keeps reappearing and making all those article-bloating edits. At first they were reverted normally and the person’s talk page would get some stern warnings. However, several IPs ago, it was determined that the person is bad faith, and they keep changing their IP to continue to edit. Therefore, the edits that the IP made have been getting treated as bad faith ever since. Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation. Furries make the Internets go! :3 19:15, 16 December 2017 (EST)