SmashWiki:Featured content: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(up voted)
m (Updated per new featured article)
 
(185 intermediate revisions by 54 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{shortcut|[[SW:FA]]}}
{{shortcut|[[SW:FA]]}}
{{TagBase|image=Featured.png|r=255|g=201|b=38
|content=The next featured article gets chosen on '''January 1, 2017'''.<br>The current vote leader is '''[[Super Smash Bros. 4]]''' with a total of '''+7'''.}}
'''Featured articles''' are considered to be the best articles on SmashWiki, as determined by our editors. Before being listed here, articles are reviewed at featured article candidates for accuracy, completeness, and style.  A small, stylized ''Super Smash Bros.'' logo with a star on an article's page indicates that the article is featured, or has been featured in the past.


You can view all featured article snippets on [[SmashWiki:Featured content/Full]].
'''Featured articles''' are considered to be the best articles on SmashWiki, as determined by our editors. Before being listed here, articles should be reviewed for accuracy, completeness, and style.  A small, stylized ''Super Smash Bros.'' logo with a star on an article's page indicates that the article is featured, or has been featured in the past.
 
You can view all prior featured articles and their snippets on [[SmashWiki:Featured content/Full]].


==Rules and regulations==
==Rules and regulations==
*Feature articles will be chosen quarterly: on the first of January, April, July, and October.
*Featured articles will be chosen around a bimonthly basis, though there is no set timeline for when a new featured article will be implemented.
:*New suggestions may not be added in the month leading up to the next featured article (e.g. no suggestions in December because it's a month before January).
*Like most other proposals on the wiki, featured articles will not be chosen based on vote count alone, admins can override the most popular suggested article if they deem it of unsatisfactory quality, or otherwise find another article to be more feature-worthy.
*Feature articles will be chosen based on vote count alone.
*For the inherent eligibility for an article to be featured, keep the following in mind:
:*The article with the highest vote total (supports being +1, opposes being -1) will be chosen.
**Any articles with a maintenance template on it is not eligible to be featured. If you want to feature an article tagged with such a template, fix the issues the article was tagged with the template for before trying to suggest it.
:*In the event of a tie, an admin picks which article gets used.
***Note that this does not apply to articles with templates that indicate an issue with the page that likely cannot be fixed, such as a tournament tagged with {{t|LostResults}} or an image tagged with {{t|HighQualityUnavailable}}.
*Suggestions expire:
**Articles in the Smasher, Tournament, and Team spaces are eligible for featuring, but they should cover especially notable subjects to be considered, and must have substantial content on them beyond just a table of results. Additionally, any Smasher article not fully updated to our [[SW:SMASHER|current standards]] will be automatically rejected.
:*a year after they are given, should they not be chosen.
**Articles about subjects that encompass insubstantial content should not be considered for featuring.
:*quarterly if they have a score of less than 0.
**Articles that have been featured previously are eligible to be refeatured. Any article that was featured before [[SmashWiki:Featured content/Full|FA54]] can be considered automatically eligible for refeaturing, but going forward, any articles featured after that point should be only be considered for refeaturing if substantial new information has been added to it since its original featuring, or other feature candidates are just so lackluster that SmashWiki is better off refeaturing the same content.
*There may be no more than 10 suggestions at any one time.
*Suggestions expire after no set time, but admins can reject them if they prove unpopular or otherwise gain little traction after a long enough time, assuming there's no glaring quality issue with the suggested article to reject it outright.
*Each user is limited to one suggestion per voting period.  
*Each user is limited to having only one suggestion up at a time, and users may not withdraw their own suggestions. Additionally, once a user has made a suggestion, they may not make a new suggestion for two months regardless of if they have a suggestion currently up or not.
*All suggestions will be archived when they pass or fail (see [[SmashWiki:Featured content/Archive|here]]).
*Suggested articles that were rejected are not automatically disqualified from being suggested again, but if the issues that resulted in it being rejected haven't been addressed, it will promptly get rejected again.
*All votes should be '''bolded''' or they will not be counted. (e.g. "'''support''' because this page is the greatest of them all!")
*All suggestions will be archived when they pass or fail.
 
**[[/Archive 1|Archive 1]]
==Things to consider==
**[[/Archive 2|Archive 2]]
The following is a list of things to consider, both when nominating and voting on an article
**[[/Archive 3|Archive 3]]
#'''Quality and completeness of the article:''' Does the article sufficiently cover the topic at hand? Is it comprehensible and easy to follow? Are images used effectively and not excessively? Is the article lacking in grammar and spelling errors?
#'''Relevance to Smash''': Is the article directly related to the Smash series, or is it more tangential?
#'''Requirements''': Does the article have a sufficiently lengthy opening paragraph that it will fill out the featured article space on the main page? Does the article have an identifying image to accompany this description? Has the article been featured before (we do not accept articles that have already been featured)?


==How to request that an article be featured==
==How to request that an article be featured==
Line 33: Line 29:
*Be sure to sign your proposition with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>
*Be sure to sign your proposition with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>


==Proposed Featured Articles==
Other users may then respond expressing either support or opposition to the suggestion. Users should judge an article for how feature-worthy it is based on the article's comprehensiveness of the subject at hand, how well-written the article is, how accurate the information within the article is, if the article is clean of errors, and every other thing that contributes to an article's quality (e.g. how effectively are images used in the article). Users should not base their judgment on things not related to the article's content, such as how interesting they personally find the article's subject or assume others would find it, if the article would be too "complicated" for the average reader, how "relevant" they think the article subject is, nor based on how frequent similarly themed articles have been featured in the past. "Votes" based on reasons that have little-to-nothing to do with the article's content will be ignored. The exception is with Smasher, Tournament, and Team articles, where the subject's notability will also be considered as mentioned previously.
===[[Palutena's Guidance]]===
A fun and detailed page on one of the elements of ''Smash'' that really makes it unique. <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|you]]. Or maybe [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]].</small>  13:24, 27 January 2016 (EST)
:'''Support''': I don't see why not. <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:12pt">[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083">'''Serpent'''</span>]] [[File:SKSig.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0;">'''King'''</span></span>]] 22:45, 27 January 2016 (EST)
::'''weak oppose''' its a great article, just that it is to minor to be a FA in my opinion [[File:PoultrysigSSB4.png|20x50px]][[User:Poultry|<font color="red">'''Poultry'''</font>]][[File:PoultrysigSSBM.png|20x50px]]''([[User talk:Poultry#top|<font color="blue">talk</font>]])'' the fluffy 17:01, 7 February 2016 (EST)
:::But like, it's not about the topic of the article? First of all, Palutena's Guidance isn't really minor. Secondly, even if it ''was'', if it's a "great article" it deserves to be featured whether or not it's a major one. <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|<font color="magenta">cupid♥</font>]]. Or maybe [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]].</small>  20:29, 7 February 2016 (EST)
::::I would like to hear a response to this, given that it's currently hindering this page's chances of being featured for a reason I believe is false. <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|<font color="magenta">cupid♥</font>]]. Or maybe [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]].</small>  20:54, 13 February 2016 (EST)
::::Yes, the major flaw of going by vote count alone...I agree with DNK, though. If you are going to oppose an FA, you should at least have a semi-valid reason for doing so. <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:12pt">[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083">'''Serpent'''</span>]] [[File:SKSig.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0;">'''King'''</span></span>]] 21:07, 13 February 2016 (EST)
::::: sorry for this late response but i think that if codec wasnt featured, why should PG be (codec for the win!) plus codec is much more detailed about all the metal gear references [[File:PoultrysigSSB4.png|20x50px]][[User:Poultry|<font color="red">'''Poultry'''</font>]][[File:PoultrysigSSBM.png|20x50px]]''([[User talk:Poultry#top|<font color="blue">talk</font>]])'' the Pumpkin Pie 16:49, 28 February 2016 (EST)
::::::That's... not a better reason. Besides, PG doesn't have nearly as many references as the codec does, so it can't be more detailed. It has all of the relevant information listed. Besides, you can re-nominate Codec if you want. But judging this one based on the fact that an article you liked wasn't seems unfair. <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|you]]. Or maybe [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]].</small>  13:04, 1 March 2016 (EST)
::::::: i said that i think that codec is a better article in all qualities, i dont think this one should be featured if a completely better article was not featured. [[File:PoultrysigSSB4.png|20x50px]][[User:Poultry|<font color="red">'''Poultry'''</font>]][[File:PoultrysigSSBM.png|20x50px]]''([[User talk:Poultry#top|<font color="blue">talk</font>]])'' the Pumpkin Pie 18:38, 5 March 2016 (EST)
::'''Support.''' I love her Guidance. --[[File:BeepYouSignature.png|50px]] '''The 70's called. They said''' [[User:BeepYou|<font color="Black">'''BeepYou was here :v'''</font>]] [[User talk:BeepYou|<font color="Black">'''(talk)'''</font>]] 17:30, 7 February 2016 (EST)
::'''Weak oppose.''' Not quite enough prose SmashWiki editors actually wrote. [[File:Nyargleblargle.png|16px]][[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color:LawnGreen">'''Nyargle</span>]][[User talk:Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: orange;">'''blargle'''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 18:35, 2 March 2016 (EST)
::'''Weak support''' Honestly pretty interesting subject but somewhat minor. [[User:Dots|<font color="red">'''D'''</font><font color="green">'''o'''</font><font color="blue">'''t'''</font><font color="purple">'''s'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Dots|talk]]) [[File:Mega Man X SNES sprite.png|19px]] The Greninja 19:13, 2 March 2016 (EST)
:::'''Support.''' It's funny, which is fitting, considering the feature will start on April Fools' Day. <span style="font-family:Mario Party 2/3 Textbox">[[User:RickTommy|<span style="color:red">Rick</span>]][[User talk:RickTommy|<span style="color:green">Tommy</span>]]</span> 22:46, 2 March 2016 (EST)
:'''Weak oppose'''. Doesn't have much written other than quotes. [[Codec Conversations]] has more notes even though Brawl has less characters. -- [[User:Ethan7|<span style="color:#000f55;font-family:Cursive;font-style:italic">Ethan</span>]][[file:Ethan7sig.png|20px|link=User:Ethan7]]<small>''([[User talk:Ethan7|<span style="color:Blue">Discussion</span>]])''</small> 23:21, 2 March 2016 (EST)
:::'''Oppose'''. While it's accurate, complete, and has good style, the majority of it isn't "written" by us, as it is mostly direct quotes from the game. [[User:MuteSpittah|MuteSpittah]] ([[User talk:MuteSpittah|talk]]) 18:53, 6 March 2016 (EST)
:'''Support''': Palutena's Guidance is my favorite Smash Taunt, and my overall favorite taunt. (Luigi's down taunt is a close second.) [[User:Green Machine|Green Machine]] ([[User talk:Green Machine|talk]]) 11:30, 16 March 2016 (EDT)Green Machine
:'''Support''' The taunt is nice in this game so, I will agree! [[User:Dragonfirebreath25|Dragonfirebreath25]] ([[User talk:Dragonfirebreath25|talk]]) 18:40, 12 April 2016 (EDT)
:'''Support''' Because why not? Also, it's a neat article in my opinion and very detailed as well. So yeah. [[File:PikachuMS.png|20px]][[User:ThePikaPlayer|<span style="color: gold;">'''Pika,'''</span>]] [[User Talk:ThePikaPlayer|<span style="color: magenta;">'''Poyo poyo poyo'''</span>]] 12:32, 12 June 2016 (EDT)
:'''Weak oppose''' I have to agree that it's really just a list of quotes ripped directly from ''SSB4''. Not that it's not an interesting article all the same. [[User:BaconMaster|<span style="color: Crimson;">'''Bacon'''</span>]][[User talk:BaconMaster|<span style="color: Maroon;">'''Master'''</span>]][[File:BaconMasterSig.png|16px|link=]] 16:27, 1 July 2016 (EDT)
:'''Oppose''' I don't believe this is actually a good example of SmashWiki's excellence, which is what we are looking for in a featured article, due to the lack of prose. Plus, most of the Support votes aren't really about the article, but the Guidenece itself, which really isn't the point. [[File:PenroImage.png|19px]][[User:Penro|<font color="red">'''Pen'''</font><font color="black">'''''ro'''''</font>]] 13:34, 8 July 2016 (EDT)
:'''Oppose''': The article only occasionally elaborates on some of the detalis brought up in conversations (the Koopalings mystery, Link and Pit being released on the same year, etc.) and not others (the "ninjas that just eats very slowly" comment with Greninja, Falco being the leader of a galactic gang, "DO A BARREL ROLL!" with Fox, etc.). This is especially important since the article links to the characters' playstyle in SSB4 and not the "main" articles that actually have their backstory. Beyond that, some of the existing writing is a bit clunky in places; it's noticeable with the notes for Meta Knight, Samus, Shulk, WFTrainer, Yoshi, and especially Wario, though it wouldn't take much to clean it up. The lack of images doesn't help it much, either. [[User:Reversinator|Reversinator]] ([[User talk:Reversinator|talk]]) 12:22, 3 September 2016 (EDT)
 
'''Strongly Support'''. Probably one of the most interesting aspects of SSB4, I know nothing of KI but I still love hearing what they have to say regarding the different characters. It gives an in-universe look at how some nintendo characters see each other. Also viridi's comment about "''Spending years studying Ganon Canon''" made me laugh my butt off. One of the best features in this game.<br>[[User:Ixbran|Ixbran]] ([[User talk:Ixbran|talk]]) 22:51, 22 September 2016 (EDT)
 
'''Oppose''': It's more of a transcription than article. '''''[[User:HavocReaper48|<span style="color:GOLDENROD; font-family:envirod;">--HavocReaper</span>]][[User talk:HavocReaper48|<span style="color:GOLD; font-family:envirod;">48</span>]]''''' 20:11, 26 September 2016 (EDT)
 
'''Oppose''', A similar yet lesser page than Snake's Codec which has yet to be featured[[User:Destructodon|Destructodon]] ([[User talk:Destructodon|talk]]) 19:03, 23 October 2016 (EDT)
 
===[[Robin (SSB4)]]===
A well-written page that covers the character in a clear and concise manner, also very clean and demonstrates everything a fighter page should be. [[User:MuteSpittah|MuteSpittah]] ([[User talk:MuteSpittah|talk]]) 22:46, 3 April 2016 (EDT)
 
'''Support''' This is good indeed. I like it so much. [[User:Dragonfirebreath25|Dragonfirebreath25]] ([[User talk:Dragonfirebreath25|talk]]) 07:20, 4 April 2016 (EDT)
:"Victory poses" has an incomplete tag in it. -- [[User:Ethan7|<span style="color:#000f55;font-family:Cursive;font-style:italic">Ethan</span>]][[file:Ethan7sig.png|20px|link=User:Ethan7]]<small>''([[User talk:Ethan7|<span style="color:Blue">Discussion</span>]])''</small> 14:42, 7 April 2016 (EDT)
::Yeah. That's pretty minor though. Marth also had an incomplete tag while it was featured for a time as well. [[User:MuteSpittah|MuteSpittah]] ([[User talk:MuteSpittah|talk]]) 14:47, 7 April 2016 (EDT)
:::Just saying (no one really voted for Marth anyways). -- [[User:Ethan7|<span style="color:#000f55;font-family:Cursive;font-style:italic">Ethan</span>]][[file:Ethan7sig.png|20px|link=User:Ethan7]]<small>''([[User talk:Ethan7|<span style="color:Blue">Discussion</span>]])''</small> 14:57, 7 April 2016 (EDT)
::::'''Weak support'''. Great, but a bit too long, especially the opening paragraph. [[File:Nyargleblargle.png|16px]][[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color:LawnGreen">'''Nyargle</span>]][[User talk:Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: orange;">'''blargle'''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 15:50, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
 
'''Oppose''': really starting to get tired of always featuring fighters. <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:12pt">'''[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px #0b7">Serpent</span>]] [[File:SKSig.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px #fd0">King</span>]]'''</span> 20:25, 26 June 2016 (EDT)
 
'''Strong Oppose''' It's missing Japanese in one section. [[File:AlbumArt-Dixie.png|20px]]  [[User:TabuuandMasterCore|TabuuandMasterCore]] 11:58, 29 June 2016 (EDT)
:'''Weak support''' Though it is a superb article, 2/3 of the past 3 featured articles (including the current one) have been ''FE'' characters. However, as this one is a game-specific page, I feel it is a bit more of a change. [[User:BaconMaster|<span style="color: Crimson;">'''Bacon'''</span>]][[User talk:BaconMaster|<span style="color: Maroon;">'''Master'''</span>]][[File:BaconMasterSig.png|16px|link=]] 16:27, 1 July 2016 (EDT)
 
'''Oppose'''. It could still use some work and I don't really see Robin as a feature article that too soon. [[User:Dots|<font color="red">'''D'''</font><font color="green">'''o'''</font><font color="blue">'''t'''</font><font color="purple">'''s'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Dots|talk]]) [[File:Mega Man X SNES sprite.png|19px]] The Blue 21:54, 8 July 2016 (EDT)
 
===[[Link]]===
Has a lot of info, is clean and has many nice images. -- [[User:Ethan7|<span style="color:#000f55;font-family:Cursive;font-style:italic">Ethan</span>]][[file:Ethan7sig.png|20px|link=User:Ethan7]]<small>''([[User talk:Ethan7|<span style="color:Blue">Discussion</span>]])''</small> 23:38, 3 April 2016 (EDT)
 
'''Support''' A good one indeed. [[User:Dragonfirebreath25|Dragonfirebreath25]] ([[User talk:Dragonfirebreath25|talk]]) 14:01, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
:'''Weak oppose''' Solid, but could be more concise. Take, for example, the Smash 64 section. [[File:Nyargleblargle.png|16px]][[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color:LawnGreen">'''Nyargle</span>]][[User talk:Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: orange;">'''blargle'''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 15:50, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
Support! I mean, come on! It's Link! He is a good fighter and the theread is clean, very nice, and has (like any other thread or whatever you call it. ∆_∆) much info! [[User:Cypher123|&#32;Hello!]] ([[User talk:Cypher123|talk]]) 12:22, 2 June 2016 (EDT) <!--- Vote was posted before it was a rule to make the position in bold. --->
:'''Oppose''': really starting to get tired of always featuring fighters. <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:12pt">'''[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px #0b7">Serpent</span>]] [[File:SKSig.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px #fd0">King</span>]]'''</span> 20:25, 26 June 2016 (EDT)
::'''Strong oppose''' Same reason as Serpent King. [[File:AlbumArt-Dixie.png|20px]]  [[User:TabuuandMasterCore|TabuuandMasterCore]] 14:07, 2 July 2016 (EDT)
:::The 46 featured articles so far have consisted of 11 characters, <b>12 stages </b>, 3 game mechanics, 3 games, 3 game menu areas (SSE, My Music, and Stickers), 2  bosses, 2 items (counting the Final Smash), 2 cosmetic items (music and costumes), 2 techniques, 2 fan creations (Smashtasm and tier list), 1 special move, 1 about AI, 1 about glitches, and 1 about stage aspects (platform). At a 11:12:23 ratio of characters:stages:misc, you have a 23.9%, 26.1%, and 50% featuring proportion, respectively. For a game based heavily on the stages and fighters, these ratios are pretty much expected. If you're getting tired of us recently having featured character articles (which is a whopping number of 2 if you go back to the Master Hand glitch), you need a different voting system. <span style="font-family:Orbitron">[[User:Megatron1|<span style="color:maroon">Mega</span>]][[User talk:Megatron1|<span style="color:silver">Tron1</span>]]</span>[[File:Decepticon.png|19px]] 12:34, 4 July 2016 (EDT)
 
'''Weak support'''. Great character for a feature article but it could be better. @Serpent King: Why do you think that? [[Fireball]] and [[amiibo]], some of the more recent FAs, aren't about characters. [[User:Dots|<font color="red">'''D'''</font><font color="green">'''o'''</font><font color="blue">'''t'''</font><font color="purple">'''s'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Dots|talk]]) [[File:Mega Man X SNES sprite.png|19px]] The Blue 21:54, 8 July 2016 (EDT)
 
'''Support'''. It's a pretty good article, with plenty of good images, information about him, and his useful tools and placement. [[File:PikachuMS.png|20px]][[User:ThePikaPlayer|<span style="color: gold;">'''Pika,'''</span>]] [[User Talk:ThePikaPlayer|<span style="color: grey;">'''Chilly!'''</span>]] 14:17, 10 December 2016 (EST)
 
'''Support'''. When I read over it I didn't see anything glaringly wrong. --[[User:Meester Tweester|Meester Tweester]] ([[User talk:Meester Tweester|talk]]) 20:21, 13 December 2016 (EST)
 
===[[Stale-move negation]]===
Describes everything in full detail and tells it in a very clean way. Plus, very well known, and somewhat detailed. [[User:Penro|'''Penro''']][[File:PenroDarkPitHead.png|19px]] [[File:PenroZSSHead.png|19px]] 20:14, 5 April 2016 (EDT)
:'''Support''' per Penro. [[File:Nyargleblargle.png|16px]][[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color:LawnGreen">'''Nyargle</span>]][[User talk:Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: orange;">'''blargle'''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 15:50, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
'''Support''' for this reason. [[User:Dragonfirebreath25|Dragonfirebreath25]] ([[User talk:Dragonfirebreath25|talk]]) 16:18, 14 April 2016 (EDT)
 
Bump. This page really is very good, and I'd hate for it to be missed out on it's chance to shine. [[File:PenroImage.png|19px]][[User:Penro|<font color="red">'''Pen'''</font><font color="black">'''''ro'''''</font>]] 16:43, 1 July 2016 (EDT)
 
'''Weak oppose''' I think that it might be a little to complicated for some people, but otherwise it is a great article  [[File:PoultrysigSSB4.png|20x50px]][[User:Poultry|<font color="red">'''Poultry'''</font>]][[File:PoultrysigSSBM.png|20x50px]]''([[User talk:Poultry#top|<font color="blue">talk</font>]])'' the God-Slayer 07:13, 7 July 2016 (EDT)
:'''Support''' even if it is somewhat complicated for some, it is an important and good article all the same. [[User:BaconMaster|<span style="color: Crimson;">'''Bacon'''</span>]][[User talk:BaconMaster|<span style="color: Maroon;">'''Master'''</span>]][[File:BaconMasterSig.png|16px|link=]] 13:30, 7 July 2016 (EDT)
:'''Weak Support'''. Could be better but it talks about an interesting mechanic. [[User:Dots|<font color="red">'''D'''</font><font color="green">'''o'''</font><font color="blue">'''t'''</font><font color="purple">'''s'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Dots|talk]]) [[File:Mega Man X SNES sprite.png|19px]] The Blue 21:54, 8 July 2016 (EDT)
 
===[[Super Smash Bros. Melee in competitive play]]===
It really shows how a game designed to be non-competitive can become a competitive scene where people can win up to 15k, shows ups and downs of a important part of this Wiki, it also shows how much the competitive scene, and Smash Bros. as a whole advanced from its early days. That's including SmashWiki too. It is written in a way that many people wouldn't imagine doing, many people don't even think there was a platinum age. It also is written in long and informing paragraphs that definitly tells us a great our community is to put in that much time into one article. I can go on and on about how good this article is and how much it deserves to be featured, but i cannot make up your minds. You, and the rest of the SmashWiki community, will judge this article wisely  [[File:PoultrysigSSB4.png|20x50px]][[User:Poultry|<font color="red">'''Poultry'''</font>]][[File:PoultrysigSSBM.png|20x50px]]''([[User talk:Poultry#top|<font color="blue">talk</font>]])'' the God-Slayer 10:53, 1 July 2016 (EDT)
:'''Weak support'''. A bit lengthy towards the end, but overall well-written and has just the right amount of images. [[File:Nyargleblargle.png|16px]][[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color:LawnGreen">'''Nyargle</span>]][[User talk:Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: orange;">'''blargle'''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 17:36, 2 July 2016 (EDT)
:'''Support''' per NB. [[User:BaconMaster|<span style="color: Crimson;">'''Bacon'''</span>]][[User talk:BaconMaster|<span style="color: Maroon;">'''Master'''</span>]][[File:BaconMasterSig.png|16px|link=]] 13:30, 7 July 2016 (EDT)
:'''Weak Oppose'''. Well-written, but do you think this would be interesting enough? I don't really think so. [[User:Dots|<font color="red">'''D'''</font><font color="green">'''o'''</font><font color="blue">'''t'''</font><font color="purple">'''s'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Dots|talk]]) [[File:Mega Man X SNES sprite.png|19px]] The Blue 21:54, 8 July 2016 (EDT)
 
===[[Super Smash Bros. 4]]===
well written, no cleanup in any of the sections. [[File:AlbumArt-Dixie.png|20px]]  [[User:TabuuandMasterCore|TabuuandMasterCore]] 17:24, 8 July 2016 (EDT)
:'''Weak Support''' Very well-known to the community at large, which is important. <s>However, I do feel this may seem biased towards the game, as I don't believe any of the other games have been featured.</s>[[File:PenroImage.png|19px]][[User:Penro|<font color="red">'''Pen'''</font><font color="black">'''''ro'''''</font>]] 17:48, 8 July 2016 (EDT)
Ignore that last part, ALL of the other games have been featured. It's now Smash 4's turn. [[File:PenroImage.png|19px]][[User:Penro|<font color="red">'''Pen'''</font><font color="black">'''''ro'''''</font>]] 17:51, 8 July 2016 (EDT)
:'''Super Smashing Support''' A well-written page with new modes, new characters, and new stages. This is going to be featured and that's... GAME! [[User:Dragonfirebreath25|Dragonfirebreath25]] ([[User talk:Dragonfirebreath25|talk]]) 10:00, 10 July 2016 (EDT)
:'''Support''' I can definitely get behind this <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:12pt">'''[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px #0b7">Serpent</span>]] [[File:SKSig.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px #fd0">King</span>]]'''</span> 12:14, 31 July 2016 (EDT)
:'''Support'''. Oh yes. [[User:Dots|<font color="red">'''D'''</font><font color="green">'''o'''</font><font color="blue">'''t'''</font><font color="purple">'''s'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Dots|talk]]) [[File:Mega Man X SNES sprite.png|19px]] The Zerg Rush 19:18, 13 August 2016 (EDT)
:'''Support'''. I don't see what makes it any less worth than the other pages. -- [[User:Ethan7|<span style="color:#000f55;font-family:Cursive;font-style:italic">Ethan</span>]][[file:Ethan7sig.png|20px|link=User:Ethan7]]<small>''([[User talk:Ethan7|<span style="color:Blue">Discussion</span>]])''</small> 17:17, 26 August 2016 (EDT)
'''Weak oppose'''. Overall, it's an excellent article, but a few sections are overly lengthy IMO. The gameplay changes should probably be summarized and/or made into bullet points, for example. [[File:Nyargleblargle.png|16px]][[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color:LawnGreen">'''Nyargle</span>]][[User talk:Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: orange;">'''blargle'''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 19:28, 30 August 2016 (EDT)
 
'''Oppose'''. We should probably wait until we know that no more gameplay balances are to be made so we don't end up having to edit a featured article. [[User:Destructodon|Destructodon]] ([[User talk:Destructodon|talk]]) 14:19, 16 October 2016 (EDT)
:I think at this point, we can be pretty sure that they are done, but I could be wrong. Even still, I don't really see how this is a good reason to not feature it... editing a featured article is not really a big deal. <span style="font-family:Chiller;font-size:18px;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px #222">[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#d50">Serpent</span>]] [[File:SKSigHalloween.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#d50">King</span>]]</span> 14:28, 16 October 2016 (EDT)
:So are you discounting my oppose because you disagree with it, which is unfair, or does the initial suggestion count as a support? And the reason that i believe my reason is good is that if we have to edit it, it isn't complete, which is one of the criteria.
::No no of course not. Your vote is still counted. There are 6 supports (the initial suggestion counts as one) and 2 opposes for a total of +4 <span style="font-family:Chiller;font-size:18px;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px #222">[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#d50">Serpent</span>]] [[File:SKSigHalloween.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#d50">King</span>]]</span> 15:57, 16 October 2016 (EDT)


'''Support''' This wiki made lots of dedication to pages about Smash Bros. games. I felt that the Smash 4 page followed the templates for the other games into being well written. [[:User:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|ZeldaStarfoxfan2164]] ([[User talk:ZeldaStarfoxfan2164|talk]]) is a never lover boy  20:05, 23 October 2016 (EDT)
==Proposed featured articles==
:'''Support''' [[File:AidanzapunkChristmasSig.png|20px]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: red;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: green;">'''the Jolly Dragon Warrior'''</span>]][[File:AidanzapunkChristmasSig2.png|20px]] 21:28, 20 December 2016 (EST)
===Anniversaries===
The title is intentionally vague because it encompasses more than just one article, but stay with me on this one.


===[[Stage Builder]]===
Obviously, we could have a standard "featured article" that stays up as normal, but I think it would be really cool to feature an article for a character or series for a single day based on their date of origin. As examples, even though we just passed it, we could have the pages for [[Sonic the Hedgehog]] or the {{uv|Sonic the Hedgehog}} universe on June 23rd; we could have the pages for [[Ryu]], [[Ken]], or the {{uv|Street Fighter}} universe on August 30th; we could have the pages for [[Cloud Strife]] or [[Sephiroth]] on January 31st, but the {{uv|Final Fantasy}} universe page on December 18th, since the series debuted on the latter date, but ''Final Fantasy VII'' released in Japan on the former date. We are an encyclopedic website covering information about all of these different video game series, so I think it would be really cool to honor them in some significant way. I should note that this would only be limited to playable characters, Assist Trophies, and {{rollover|stages|note that the stages would not be the featured article itself, but rather the universe they come from, like Nintendogs or Electroplankton|y}}, as to not make this absolutely insane, but I think it would be super neat for us to do something like that.
A pretty well rounded and concise article. The intro paragraph is a little short but it could be buffed up a bit or I could always pull a sentence or two from the ''Brawl'' and ''Smash 4'' sections. <span style="font-family:Chiller;font-size:18px;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px #222">[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#d50">Serpent</span>]] [[File:SKSigHalloween.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#d50">King</span>]]</span> 17:48, 1 October 2016 (EDT)
*'''Support''': A nice article indeed for the wiki and I like it here! [[User:Dragonfirebreath25|Dragonfirebreath25]] ([[User talk:Dragonfirebreath25|talk]]) 21:38, 1 October 2016 (EDT)


===[[Wombo Combo]]===
We ''could'' also have a "today's anniversary" template on the main page, but where's the fun in that? [[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: black;">'''Aidan'''</span>]] [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: grey;">'''the</span> <span style="color: white; text-shadow: 0 0 2px black;">Ace</span> <span style="color: purple;">Gamer'''</span>]] 13:55, June 26, 2023 (EDT)
One of the most famous moments in the history of ''Smash''. [[User:Destructodon|Destructodon]] ([[User talk:Destructodon|talk]]) 14:14, 16 October 2016 (EDT)
:How would characters/universes without specific anniversaries like Pac-Man, Bomberman and Virtua Fighter be handled? And in cases such as Mario and Donkey Kong, does that mean that we'll need to feature four articles? Pokémon alone would need a whopping eight articles featured, depending on how you count the Trainer's Pokémon. That will get overwhelming very quickly if they'll be featured as prominently as regular featured articles. [[File:NokiiSig.png|link=User_talk:Nokii]] '''[[User:Nokii|<span style="color:#89F">Nokii</span>]] ·''' 14:58, June 26, 2023 (EDT)
:I take it you didn't read the "things to consider" section. We shouldn't only suggest things based on relevance, we also need to look at the quality and completeness of the article. [[User:Disaster Flare|<span style="color:Purple; text-shadow: 0px 0px 3px purple">'''Disaster'''</span> <span style="color:Orange;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px orange">'''Flare'''</span>]] [[File:DisasterFlareHalloweenSigImage.png|20px]] ''[[User talk:Disaster Flare|<span style="color:Black;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px black">(talk)</span>]]'' 14:33, 16 October 2016 (EDT)
::Note how I used the word "or" ("Sonic the Hedgehog '''''or''''' the ''Sonic the Hedgehog'' universe", "Ryu, Ken, '''''or''''' the ''Street Fighter'' universe", "Cloud Strife '''''or''''' Sephiroth")—it would only be one page as the featured article at a time, cycling through a predetermined pattern. For stuff like Pac-Man, Bomberman, and Virtua Fighter, I want to say that Sakurai has posted on Twitter for those anniversaries in the past, and we could use those dates as a basis—if not, we could use the first of the month that they debuted in (and if it came down to only knowing a year, then we could reach some agreement on how to handle that). I'd be more than happy to compile information surrounding my above suggestion to make sure everyone knew what was associated with which date. [[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: yellow;">'''Aidan'''</span>]] [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: white; text-shadow: 0 0 2px black;">'''the</span> <span style="color: purple;">Nonbinary</span> <span style="color: black;">Gamer'''</span>]] 14:19, June 27, 2023 (EDT)
Well I'll have you know i did read that and i believe the article is a complete, quality article. [[User:Destructodon|Destructodon]] ([[User talk:Destructodon|talk]]) 15:54, 16 October 2016 (EDT)
:'''Oppose.''' I was okay with Fox (SSBM) being featured considering that he is the face of Competitive Melee with an well in-depth article explaining his tournament popularity and success in Melee, and that I agree that competitive articles in general need to be featured more often. However, we do not need to go as far as memes from competitive play regardless of how (in)famous they are. Plus, like Disaster Flare said, an article is featured for quality and completeness.


:(On a personal note, I personally think that while the Wombo Combo is still a classic moment among the Smash community, the meme is honestly getting really old, not helped by the fact that the annoying MLG videos abuse them.) [[User:Dots|<font color="red">'''D'''</font><font color="green">'''o'''</font><font color="blue">'''t'''</font><font color="purple">'''s'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Dots|talk]]) [[File:Mega Man X SNES sprite.png|19px]] The Bullet 00:42, 24 October 2016 (EDT)
===[[Kazuya (SSBU)]]===
::'''Oppose''': after thinking about it, I seriously do not think that this article is feature material. The article is 10 mostly short sections that talk very little about the combo itself (not the fault of the writer, there really is little to talk about), then the rest of the article is about its legacy, which is really not the best formatting method. <span style="font-family:Chiller;font-size:18px;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px #000">'''[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#d50">Serpent</span>]] [[File:SKSigHalloween.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#d50">King</span>]]'''</span> 00:53, 24 October 2016 (EDT)
This article looks very well written for an [[Downloadable content (SSBU)|''Ultimate'' DLC character]] to me, especially considering the amount of technical data articles we at SmashWiki had to create for Kazuya's 38 moves. It must've taken a lot of willing contributors and/or massive effort to bring the article to its near-complete if not complete status we have today, including the articles detailing his [[command-input move]]s, special moves, [[Crouch Dash]], technical data for each move (except for [[Heaven's Door]] and [[Final Blaster]], which do not have technical articles yet), etc. Deserves featured article status to me. [[User:Jordan P.|Jordan P.,]] [[User talk:Jordan P.|the Sora main]] [[File:SoraHeadSSBUWebsite.png|15px]] 00:17, June 28, 2023 (EDT)
:::'''{{rollover|Comme ci, comme ça|So so|y}}''' It ''is'' famous, but the article doesn't really have much in it. [[File:AidanzapunkChristmasSig.png|20px]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: red;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: green;">'''the Jolly Dragon Warrior'''</span>]][[File:AidanzapunkChristmasSig2.png|20px]] 21:28, 20 December 2016 (EST)
:Right away I notice the bloated gallery and trivia sections, I'm not even going to bother reviewing the rest of the article as long as these two glaring problems have not been addressed yet, which are two things directly stated as needing cleaning up in our [[SW:Project|projects page]]. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[File: TyranitarMS.png ]] 06:26, June 28, 2023 (EDT)
::I know how these sections are usually laid out, because I've seen a lot of SSBU's character articles, if not all. It displays from left to right the newcomer splash art, the amiibo, the unlock notice, promotional screenshots, and screenshots from Sakurai's Pic of the Day series on Twitter. Additionally, like other articles, the trivia section states miscellaneous facts. What could we clean up to me? For me, that's inconsistent. [[User:Jordan P.|Jordan P.,]] [[User talk:Jordan P.|the Sora main]] [[File:SoraHeadSSBUWebsite.png|15px]] 00:18, June 30, 2023 (EDT)
:::Read the projects page, and a bunch of other character articles being like that does not make it ok, the fact so many of them have bloated trivia and gallery sections '''''is why''''' it's a wiki project. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[File: TyranitarMS.png ]] 06:29, June 30, 2023 (EDT)


===[[Bayonetta (SSB4)]]===
===[[King K. Rool (SSBU)]]===
Considering the fact she won the Smash Ballot, I feel she deserves some lime light. Her smash bros profile has a lot of work put into it, she has a lot of extra abilities, like Bullet Arts and Bat Within, that make her one of the more unique characters in the game. And I just feel that she deserves some recognition for that. The one character everyone thought would never get into Smash Bros. not only getting in, but getting in due to popular demand. That and the fact they were able to tone down her sexual nature for an E10+ game, while still staying true to her character, I feel was an amazing feat by Sakurai.<br>[[User:Ixbran|Ixbran]] ([[User talk:Ixbran|talk]]) 11:48, 17 December 2016 (EST)
A very well written page with numerous images, as well as a great summary on his weaknesses and strengths. All of K. Rool's moves have technical data and their own weaknesses and strengths. I believe the only issue with this page is the missing announcer calls, which is a very small things. I think this article should be featured for these reasons, this page is the greatest of them all. [[User:EpicMagicBoi6|EpicMagicBoi6]] ([[User talk:EpicMagicBoi6|talk]]) 21:47, July 2, 2023 (EDT)
:'''Oppose''' The FA is mostly based on the quality of the article, not the content of the article itself. [[File:AidanzapunkChristmasSig.png|20px]][[User:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: red;">'''Aidan'''</span>]], [[User talk:Aidanzapunk|<span style="color: green;">'''the Jolly Dragon Warrior'''</span>]][[File:AidanzapunkChristmasSig2.png|20px]] 21:28, 20 December 2016 (EST)
:This article has bloated trivia that needs to be fixed, and the gallery isn't as bad as some others I seen but there are clearly a few images that are only there because "this image has K. Rool in it" rather than serving a distinct informative purpose. Like I said with Kazuya, these need to be addressed before reviewing the page farther to consider if it's feature-worthy. <span style="font-family:Edwardian Script ITC; font-size:12pt">[[User:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Omega</span>]] [[User talk:Omega Tyrant|<span style="color:forestgreen">Tyrant</span>]]</span> [[File: TyranitarMS.png ]] 12:10, July 3, 2023 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 06:33, September 12, 2023

Shortcut:
SW:FA

Featured articles are considered to be the best articles on SmashWiki, as determined by our editors. Before being listed here, articles should be reviewed for accuracy, completeness, and style. A small, stylized Super Smash Bros. logo with a star on an article's page indicates that the article is featured, or has been featured in the past.

You can view all prior featured articles and their snippets on SmashWiki:Featured content/Full.

Rules and regulations[edit]

  • Featured articles will be chosen around a bimonthly basis, though there is no set timeline for when a new featured article will be implemented.
  • Like most other proposals on the wiki, featured articles will not be chosen based on vote count alone, admins can override the most popular suggested article if they deem it of unsatisfactory quality, or otherwise find another article to be more feature-worthy.
  • For the inherent eligibility for an article to be featured, keep the following in mind:
    • Any articles with a maintenance template on it is not eligible to be featured. If you want to feature an article tagged with such a template, fix the issues the article was tagged with the template for before trying to suggest it.
      • Note that this does not apply to articles with templates that indicate an issue with the page that likely cannot be fixed, such as a tournament tagged with {{LostResults}} or an image tagged with {{HighQualityUnavailable}}.
    • Articles in the Smasher, Tournament, and Team spaces are eligible for featuring, but they should cover especially notable subjects to be considered, and must have substantial content on them beyond just a table of results. Additionally, any Smasher article not fully updated to our current standards will be automatically rejected.
    • Articles about subjects that encompass insubstantial content should not be considered for featuring.
    • Articles that have been featured previously are eligible to be refeatured. Any article that was featured before FA54 can be considered automatically eligible for refeaturing, but going forward, any articles featured after that point should be only be considered for refeaturing if substantial new information has been added to it since its original featuring, or other feature candidates are just so lackluster that SmashWiki is better off refeaturing the same content.
  • Suggestions expire after no set time, but admins can reject them if they prove unpopular or otherwise gain little traction after a long enough time, assuming there's no glaring quality issue with the suggested article to reject it outright.
  • Each user is limited to having only one suggestion up at a time, and users may not withdraw their own suggestions. Additionally, once a user has made a suggestion, they may not make a new suggestion for two months regardless of if they have a suggestion currently up or not.
  • Suggested articles that were rejected are not automatically disqualified from being suggested again, but if the issues that resulted in it being rejected haven't been addressed, it will promptly get rejected again.
  • All suggestions will be archived when they pass or fail.

How to request that an article be featured[edit]

To propose an article be featured, please do the following:

  • Create a heading under "Proposed featured articles" that looks like this: ===Article Name===, where "Article Name" is the full name of the article you believe is worthy of being labeled as a featured article.
  • Briefly explain why this article merits featured article status.
  • Be sure to sign your proposition with ~~~~

Other users may then respond expressing either support or opposition to the suggestion. Users should judge an article for how feature-worthy it is based on the article's comprehensiveness of the subject at hand, how well-written the article is, how accurate the information within the article is, if the article is clean of errors, and every other thing that contributes to an article's quality (e.g. how effectively are images used in the article). Users should not base their judgment on things not related to the article's content, such as how interesting they personally find the article's subject or assume others would find it, if the article would be too "complicated" for the average reader, how "relevant" they think the article subject is, nor based on how frequent similarly themed articles have been featured in the past. "Votes" based on reasons that have little-to-nothing to do with the article's content will be ignored. The exception is with Smasher, Tournament, and Team articles, where the subject's notability will also be considered as mentioned previously.

Proposed featured articles[edit]

Anniversaries[edit]

The title is intentionally vague because it encompasses more than just one article, but stay with me on this one.

Obviously, we could have a standard "featured article" that stays up as normal, but I think it would be really cool to feature an article for a character or series for a single day based on their date of origin. As examples, even though we just passed it, we could have the pages for Sonic the Hedgehog or the Sonic the Hedgehog universe on June 23rd; we could have the pages for Ryu, Ken, or the Street Fighter universe on August 30th; we could have the pages for Cloud Strife or Sephiroth on January 31st, but the Final Fantasy universe page on December 18th, since the series debuted on the latter date, but Final Fantasy VII released in Japan on the former date. We are an encyclopedic website covering information about all of these different video game series, so I think it would be really cool to honor them in some significant way. I should note that this would only be limited to playable characters, Assist Trophies, and stages, as to not make this absolutely insane, but I think it would be super neat for us to do something like that.

We could also have a "today's anniversary" template on the main page, but where's the fun in that? Aidan the Ace Gamer 13:55, June 26, 2023 (EDT)

How would characters/universes without specific anniversaries like Pac-Man, Bomberman and Virtua Fighter be handled? And in cases such as Mario and Donkey Kong, does that mean that we'll need to feature four articles? Pokémon alone would need a whopping eight articles featured, depending on how you count the Trainer's Pokémon. That will get overwhelming very quickly if they'll be featured as prominently as regular featured articles. NokiiSig.png Nokii · 14:58, June 26, 2023 (EDT)
Note how I used the word "or" ("Sonic the Hedgehog or the Sonic the Hedgehog universe", "Ryu, Ken, or the Street Fighter universe", "Cloud Strife or Sephiroth")—it would only be one page as the featured article at a time, cycling through a predetermined pattern. For stuff like Pac-Man, Bomberman, and Virtua Fighter, I want to say that Sakurai has posted on Twitter for those anniversaries in the past, and we could use those dates as a basis—if not, we could use the first of the month that they debuted in (and if it came down to only knowing a year, then we could reach some agreement on how to handle that). I'd be more than happy to compile information surrounding my above suggestion to make sure everyone knew what was associated with which date. Aidan the Nonbinary Gamer 14:19, June 27, 2023 (EDT)

Kazuya (SSBU)[edit]

This article looks very well written for an Ultimate DLC character to me, especially considering the amount of technical data articles we at SmashWiki had to create for Kazuya's 38 moves. It must've taken a lot of willing contributors and/or massive effort to bring the article to its near-complete if not complete status we have today, including the articles detailing his command-input moves, special moves, Crouch Dash, technical data for each move (except for Heaven's Door and Final Blaster, which do not have technical articles yet), etc. Deserves featured article status to me. Jordan P., the Sora main SoraHeadSSBUWebsite.png 00:17, June 28, 2023 (EDT)

Right away I notice the bloated gallery and trivia sections, I'm not even going to bother reviewing the rest of the article as long as these two glaring problems have not been addressed yet, which are two things directly stated as needing cleaning up in our projects page. Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 06:26, June 28, 2023 (EDT)
I know how these sections are usually laid out, because I've seen a lot of SSBU's character articles, if not all. It displays from left to right the newcomer splash art, the amiibo, the unlock notice, promotional screenshots, and screenshots from Sakurai's Pic of the Day series on Twitter. Additionally, like other articles, the trivia section states miscellaneous facts. What could we clean up to me? For me, that's inconsistent. Jordan P., the Sora main SoraHeadSSBUWebsite.png 00:18, June 30, 2023 (EDT)
Read the projects page, and a bunch of other character articles being like that does not make it ok, the fact so many of them have bloated trivia and gallery sections is why it's a wiki project. Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 06:29, June 30, 2023 (EDT)

King K. Rool (SSBU)[edit]

A very well written page with numerous images, as well as a great summary on his weaknesses and strengths. All of K. Rool's moves have technical data and their own weaknesses and strengths. I believe the only issue with this page is the missing announcer calls, which is a very small things. I think this article should be featured for these reasons, this page is the greatest of them all. EpicMagicBoi6 (talk) 21:47, July 2, 2023 (EDT)

This article has bloated trivia that needs to be fixed, and the gallery isn't as bad as some others I seen but there are clearly a few images that are only there because "this image has K. Rool in it" rather than serving a distinct informative purpose. Like I said with Kazuya, these need to be addressed before reviewing the page farther to consider if it's feature-worthy. Omega Tyrant TyranitarMS.png 12:10, July 3, 2023 (EDT)