Team talk:Deadly Alliance: Difference between revisions
Serpent King (talk | contribs) m (Serpent King moved page Talk:Empire Arcadia to Talk:Deadly Alliance: Name on Social Media) |
m (Toomai moved page Team talk:Empire Arcadia to Team talk:Deadly Alliance over redirect: revert) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Move== | ==Move== | ||
Considering that Deadly Alliance is a redirect to this page, yes. '''Support'''. [[User:Dots|<font color="red">'''D'''</font><font color="green">'''o'''</font><font color="blue">'''t'''</font><font color="purple">'''s'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Dots|talk]]) [[File:Mega Man X SNES sprite.png|19px]] The Saiyan 19:12, 27 April 2016 (EDT) | Considering that Deadly Alliance is a redirect to this page, yes. '''Support'''. [[User:Dots|<font color="red">'''D'''</font><font color="green">'''o'''</font><font color="blue">'''t'''</font><font color="purple">'''s'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Dots|talk]]) [[File:Mega Man X SNES sprite.png|19px]] The Saiyan 19:12, 27 April 2016 (EDT) | ||
=="Inaccurate information"== | |||
All the controversy that surrounded EMP written on the page was completely true. I would understand if an old-school DA member wanted to restore the page back to DA to separate themselves from the shadiness of EMP, but the way the editor handled the page looked like that they were trying to cover up EMP's shadiness and controversy. I'm not sure what's going on with DA or if they split with EMP or something, but in that case, two completely distinct articles should be created. --[[User:Timson622222|Timson622222]] ([[User talk:Timson622222|talk]]) 05:40, 13 May 2016 (EDT) | |||
:Bumping this. --[[User:Timson622222|Timson622222]] ([[User talk:Timson622222|talk]]) 20:47, 26 May 2016 (EDT) | |||
Why does this article not talk about the controversy? Aka the only reason anyone would search for this thing. Don't turn into wikipedia and have bullshit politics prevent you from delivering accurate information[[Special:Contributions/71.87.110.186|71.87.110.186]] 00:06, September 24, 2019 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:11, May 25, 2020
Move[edit]
Considering that Deadly Alliance is a redirect to this page, yes. Support. Dots (talk) 
The Saiyan 19:12, 27 April 2016 (EDT)
"Inaccurate information"[edit]
All the controversy that surrounded EMP written on the page was completely true. I would understand if an old-school DA member wanted to restore the page back to DA to separate themselves from the shadiness of EMP, but the way the editor handled the page looked like that they were trying to cover up EMP's shadiness and controversy. I'm not sure what's going on with DA or if they split with EMP or something, but in that case, two completely distinct articles should be created. --Timson622222 (talk) 05:40, 13 May 2016 (EDT)
- Bumping this. --Timson622222 (talk) 20:47, 26 May 2016 (EDT)
Why does this article not talk about the controversy? Aka the only reason anyone would search for this thing. Don't turn into wikipedia and have bullshit politics prevent you from delivering accurate information71.87.110.186 00:06, September 24, 2019 (EDT)
