Talk:Bowser (PM): Difference between revisions
Aidanzapunk (talk | contribs) (→Been meaning to bring this up...: new section) |
John3637881 (talk | contribs) (Forgot to sign post...) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Afaik, his only moveset changes are the ones listed on the page, and they don't really warrant an article, plus there are alts like Dr. Mario that have different palette swaps. I don't think it's necessary. [[User:Scr7|<span style="color:#0000FF"">S</span><span style="color:#7F7FFF">c</span><span style="color:#00FFFF">r</span><span style="color:#FF7F00">7</span>]][[File:Scr7 sig.png|link=]]([[User talk:Scr7|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Scr7|contribs]]) 18:14, 30 January 2014 (EST) | :Afaik, his only moveset changes are the ones listed on the page, and they don't really warrant an article, plus there are alts like Dr. Mario that have different palette swaps. I don't think it's necessary. [[User:Scr7|<span style="color:#0000FF"">S</span><span style="color:#7F7FFF">c</span><span style="color:#00FFFF">r</span><span style="color:#FF7F00">7</span>]][[File:Scr7 sig.png|link=]]([[User talk:Scr7|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Scr7|contribs]]) 18:14, 30 January 2014 (EST) | ||
== | == Miscellaneous == | ||
Why isn't the music change from Brawl (as it's with other ''Mario'' characters) mentioned? I think it was implemented into v3.5? --[[User:MichaelxYoshi36|MichaelxYoshi36]] ([[User talk:MichaelxYoshi36|talk]]) 18:52, 1 April 2015 (EDT) | |||
== Giga Bowser Heads? == | |||
If I recall correctly, Giga Bowser has his own stock icons (at least in 3.6). Shouldn't those be somewhere on here? (Wario-Man as well) <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|you]]. Or maybe [[User:Nutta Butta|Nutta.]] </small> 21:08, 27 June 2015 (EDT) | |||
== Bowser series symbol == | |||
Could someone replace the Mario series symbol with the Bowser one added in 3.6? I tried, but I couldn't find the coding. <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|you]]. Or maybe [[User:Nutta Butta|Nutta.]] </small> 13:22, 4 July 2015 (EDT) | |||
== Create a separate Giga Bowser page. == | |||
As Giga Bowser can be selected from the start of a match, has their own moveset changes, etc., and plays vastly different compared to Bowser, I propose we split his section into its own article. --[[User:Darth Nightmaricus|Darth Nightmaricus]] ([[User talk:Darth Nightmaricus|talk]]) 23:50, 9 July 2015 (EDT) | |||
:Wouldn't it be better to make another moveset chart for Giga Bowser? [[User:Shadow|Shadow]] ([[User talk:Shadow|talk]]) 13:02, 24 October 2015 (EDT) | |||
== Side Smash Taunt? == | |||
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjCKCeAN1OU Bowser's side taunt with biting hitboxes, is that actually a thing? I have trouble performing Smash Taunts... [[User:Shadow|Shadow]] ([[User talk:Shadow|talk]]) 02:33, 25 October 2015 (EDT) | |||
== Should we get rid of the "Revisions" sections? == | |||
I ask this because I feel some pages, {{PM|Bowser}} in particular, are becoming or are at risk of becoming too long because of the "Revisions" sections. I feel that the "Changes from ''Melee''/''Brawl'' to ''Project M''" section is sufficient enough to demonstrate changes. To me, it seems most of the "significant" info that comes with each version of ''Project M'' is covered in the "Changes from ''Melee''/''Brawl'' to ''Project M''" anyway. Besides that, a lot of the "Revisions" stuff becomes outdated as new versions of ''Project M'' come out. On top of that, in my opinion, the "Revisions" stuff really isn't too interesting or helpful. ''Project M'' probably has all that info on their site. Does anyone agree with me? <b>[[User:john3637881|<span style="color: black;">John</span>]]</b> [[File:John3637881 Signature.png|20px]] <b>[[User talk:John3637881|<span style="color: red;">PK SMAAAASH!!</span>]]</b> 18:22, 1 November 2015 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:22, November 1, 2015
Separate PM Page for Giga Bowser[edit]
Say, if Giga Bowser can be playable permanently from the start of a match, shouldn't he also have a separate Project M page? Tell me if you agree or not. Requiem of Ice (talk) 17:40, 30 January 2014 (EST)
I think that's a good idea.[edit]
Since he has his own move set and abilities. As well as his own costumes. I think it would be a good idea to make a Project M page for him. And I could help. Queen Noob (talk) 18:03, 30 January 2014 (EST)
- Afaik, his only moveset changes are the ones listed on the page, and they don't really warrant an article, plus there are alts like Dr. Mario that have different palette swaps. I don't think it's necessary. Scr7
(talk · contribs) 18:14, 30 January 2014 (EST)
Miscellaneous[edit]
Why isn't the music change from Brawl (as it's with other Mario characters) mentioned? I think it was implemented into v3.5? --MichaelxYoshi36 (talk) 18:52, 1 April 2015 (EDT)
Giga Bowser Heads?[edit]
If I recall correctly, Giga Bowser has his own stock icons (at least in 3.6). Shouldn't those be somewhere on here? (Wario-Man as well) ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe Nutta. 21:08, 27 June 2015 (EDT)
Bowser series symbol[edit]
Could someone replace the Mario series symbol with the Bowser one added in 3.6? I tried, but I couldn't find the coding. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by you. Or maybe Nutta. 13:22, 4 July 2015 (EDT)
Create a separate Giga Bowser page.[edit]
As Giga Bowser can be selected from the start of a match, has their own moveset changes, etc., and plays vastly different compared to Bowser, I propose we split his section into its own article. --Darth Nightmaricus (talk) 23:50, 9 July 2015 (EDT)
- Wouldn't it be better to make another moveset chart for Giga Bowser? Shadow (talk) 13:02, 24 October 2015 (EDT)
Side Smash Taunt?[edit]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjCKCeAN1OU Bowser's side taunt with biting hitboxes, is that actually a thing? I have trouble performing Smash Taunts... Shadow (talk) 02:33, 25 October 2015 (EDT)
Should we get rid of the "Revisions" sections?[edit]
I ask this because I feel some pages, Bowser in particular, are becoming or are at risk of becoming too long because of the "Revisions" sections. I feel that the "Changes from Melee/Brawl to Project M" section is sufficient enough to demonstrate changes. To me, it seems most of the "significant" info that comes with each version of Project M is covered in the "Changes from Melee/Brawl to Project M" anyway. Besides that, a lot of the "Revisions" stuff becomes outdated as new versions of Project M come out. On top of that, in my opinion, the "Revisions" stuff really isn't too interesting or helpful. Project M probably has all that info on their site. Does anyone agree with me? John 
PK SMAAAASH!! 18:22, 1 November 2015 (EST)
