User:MHStarCraft/Random stuff: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I do random stuff on this page apparently. :P
Per title, I do random stuff here. Things that could appear on this page include thoughts and other things.


==To do list==
==Upcoming games I want, maybe.==
No one would really care but this is basically my reminder list of some sort.
===General stuff I need or want to do===
====Major====
====Minor====


==Stuff I want to create in the Future==
==Good articles on this wiki in my opinion==
===For fun===
The articles I think are good in quality and are interesting. Maybe candidates for [[SW:FA|Featured article]].
*[[User:Dots/My Pokémon Teams]]
*[[Codec Conversations]]
*[[Fox]]
**[[Blaster]]
**[[Reflector]]
*[[Shulk (SSB4)]]  


==Stuff I do on the wiki==
===Potentially good articles but not good enough===
*I generally for the most part update, fix, and rewrite articles.
*[[Chain grab]]
*Discuss on talk pages for deletion, merging, renaming and the like.
*[[Directional influence]]
*Add "In competitive play" information to the character articles.
*[[Hookshot]]
*Basically making some Moveset subpages.
*[[Mewtwo]]
*Uploading the Hitboxes images for those Moveset subpages.
*[[R.O.B.]]
*Fixing categories, templates and other stuff.
*[[Roll]]
 
==My current ''Smash 4'' tier list thoughts==
If you want to see my current ''Smash 4'' tier list so far see [http://pastebin.com/HPQASFWa here]. Here are some of my tier notes:
*As of right now, it seems that {{SSB4|Diddy Kong}} is the most favored for the best character. Many options, Powerful and quick attacks, along with some very useful throws, nerfed but still useful Bananas, and that outright broken up aerial are just some reasons why he's this favored along with great early tournament results (if not amazing amount of wins). My brother might not really agree with Diddy Kong taking the top spot however, as he might seem to be on the predictable side but I and the rest of the community agrees that Diddy should be #1.
*{{SSB4|Sheik}} is also back to top tier. It's obvious that she has many options and a great neutral game.
*{{SSB4|Rosalina & Luma}} is also in my opinion a top tier character. as she can space very well and has very strong attacks with the Luma. My brother thinks she could actually be #1 (despite the 3DS version 1.0.4 nerf), but on the polar opposite, there are some personal tier lists that ranked her at the very least at #12. I think she is 3rd or 4th best.
*The other characters considered top tier are {{SSB4|Zero Suit Samus}}, {{SSB4|Yoshi}}, and to my surprise, even {{SSB4|Sonic}} should get a mention.
**Although not guaranteed top tier, honorable mentions goes to {{SSB4|Pikachu}}, {{SSB4|Fox}}, {{SSB4|Lucario}} and {{SSB4|Ness}}.
*Speaking of my brother, Little Mac, the character he mains on the other hand, I do not think he should rank anywhere in the top 30. While many fears him because of his uber ground game, he has a shitty air game and recovery as drawbacks, the former is something I highly do not like.
*The bottom tier guys in my opinion are {{SSB4|Zelda}}, {{SSB4|Ganondorf}}, {{SSB4|Charizard}}, {{SSB4|Olimar}}, {{SSB4|Wii Fit Trainer}}, {{SSB4|Mii Gunner}}, and {{SSB4|Mii Swordfighter}}.
*The reason why I rank {{SSB4|Luigi}} high is because he has a lot of good damage batterers and reliable KO options. I think he still has some range issues though.
*I personally tried to put {{SSB4|Marth}} and {{SSB4|Lucina}} close together with Marth being slightly better.
**Same deal goes with {{SSB4|Pit}} and {{SSB4|Dark Pit}}.
*I might be considering placing {{SSB4|Duck Hunt}} and {{SSB4|Mega Man}} higher on the list due to their great projectiles.

Latest revision as of 16:08, December 2, 2019

Per title, I do random stuff here. Things that could appear on this page include thoughts and other things.

Upcoming games I want, maybe.[edit]

Good articles on this wiki in my opinion[edit]

The articles I think are good in quality and are interesting. Maybe candidates for Featured article.

Potentially good articles but not good enough[edit]