Forum:Forum revival: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
MHStarCraft (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
BlindColours (talk | contribs) (Heavy opposition) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|Watercooler}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | {{Forumheader|Watercooler}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
'''THIS IS CLOSED''' | |||
These forums are pretty dead. They're not used too often and don't generate much discussion these days. Since forums are one of the community "hubs" (the other being IRC), we really need to snaz up these forums. Some ideas: | These forums are pretty dead. They're not used too often and don't generate much discussion these days. Since forums are one of the community "hubs" (the other being IRC), we really need to snaz up these forums. Some ideas: | ||
*Move to a seperate URL (similar to MarioWiki and other Wikis). | *Move to a seperate URL (similar to MarioWiki and other Wikis). | ||
| Line 34: | Line 35: | ||
:My main gripe with this is that there exists the possibility of the forum overtaking the Wiki in popularity; that is, too many accounts can sprout up with the sole intention of using the forums, similar to how we have users whose only contributions are to the Smash Arena. As OT said, we need to look for more editors first. ''[[User:ReiDemon|Rei]]'''''[[User_talk:ReiDemon|Demon]]''' 00:14, 4 November 2011 (EDT) | :My main gripe with this is that there exists the possibility of the forum overtaking the Wiki in popularity; that is, too many accounts can sprout up with the sole intention of using the forums, similar to how we have users whose only contributions are to the Smash Arena. As OT said, we need to look for more editors first. ''[[User:ReiDemon|Rei]]'''''[[User_talk:ReiDemon|Demon]]''' 00:14, 4 November 2011 (EDT) | ||
::To sum up what OT said, I '''oppose''' this for this is unnecessary. [[User:.....|.....]] [[User talk:.....|More]] [[Special:Contributions/.....|Food........]] [[File:FoxHeadSSBB.png|19px]] 08:17, 4 November 2011 (EDT) | ::To sum up what OT said, I '''oppose''' this for this is unnecessary. [[User:.....|.....]] [[User talk:.....|More]] [[Special:Contributions/.....|Food........]] [[File:FoxHeadSSBB.png|19px]] 08:17, 4 November 2011 (EDT) | ||
::Agree with OT, though I would like to point out that it was Shadowcrest's forum policy that was unopposed, while Clarinet Hawk's had some criticism from me that was never addressed. [[User:Mr. Anon|<font color="grey">'''Mr. '''</font><font color="midnightblue">'''Anon'''</font>]][[File:MatchupUnknown.png|23px|link=Special:Random]][[User talk:Mr. Anon|''<span style="color: black;">talk</span>'']] 19:32, 4 November 2011 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:02, November 4, 2011
Forums: Index → Watercooler → Forum revival
THIS IS CLOSED These forums are pretty dead. They're not used too often and don't generate much discussion these days. Since forums are one of the community "hubs" (the other being IRC), we really need to snaz up these forums. Some ideas:
- Move to a seperate URL (similar to MarioWiki and other Wikis).
- Spot on the Main Page.
- Sitenotice concerning the forums.
- Make forums more organized and add forum rules.
- More boards (Wiki discussion, SSB64, Tech Talk, Archives, etc).
- New design akin to most internet forums.
- Link to forums as #sw topic.
- Youtube video encouraging users to join forums (or some sort of Youtube thing).
So what do you think? And what are your ideas? BlindColours
23:31, 3 November 2011 (EDT)
- You're trying to address a problem that doesn't exist. The forum namespace being unused just means people have nothing to discuss; there's nothing wrong with that at all - and in fact I think it's a good thing. Toomai Glittershine
The Incomprehensible 23:53, 3 November 2011 (EDT)
- Why are the forums here barely used? Simply, there are vastly superior Smash forum sites out there, while we are a Wiki and not a forum site. Now to respond to your points:
- I don't see it as necessary nor helpful to move our barely used forums to another url.
- We already have a forum link in the sidebar, though I wouldn't be opposed to putting a link in the navigation section on the main page.
- Sitenotice is already used to notify people of important forums. However, the sitenotice should not be used to advertise casual forums.
- CHawk did introduced forum rules, which for some reason, were never passed despite no serious opposition to them. For being more organised, yeah they could be, but with us being a Wiki, I'm not sure if you could get them anymore organised.
- These topics can already be discuss in the forums. However, I would support more categories as I have often found myself having to put a forum in a category that didn't really fit.
- Not really necessary for them to be a different design, and I'm not sure that's possible directly on our Wiki.
- Like with the sitenotice, links to important forums are put in the IRC topic.
- My main gripe with this is that there exists the possibility of the forum overtaking the Wiki in popularity; that is, too many accounts can sprout up with the sole intention of using the forums, similar to how we have users whose only contributions are to the Smash Arena. As OT said, we need to look for more editors first. ReiDemon 00:14, 4 November 2011 (EDT)
- To sum up what OT said, I oppose this for this is unnecessary. ..... More Food........
08:17, 4 November 2011 (EDT) - Agree with OT, though I would like to point out that it was Shadowcrest's forum policy that was unopposed, while Clarinet Hawk's had some criticism from me that was never addressed. Mr. Anon
talk 19:32, 4 November 2011 (EDT)
- To sum up what OT said, I oppose this for this is unnecessary. ..... More Food........
