User talk:Zeldasmash/Spike Tier List: Difference between revisions
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Is this supposed to be a list of semi-spikes and meteor smashes, or just one of them? And wouldn't it be better to have the individual attacks listed instead of each character? (as a large amount lack either a semi-spike or a meteor smash) [[Special:Contributions/108.96.40.194|108.96.40.194]] 09:27, 7 November 2010 (EST) | Is this supposed to be a list of semi-spikes and meteor smashes, or just one of them? And wouldn't it be better to have the individual attacks listed instead of each character? (as a large amount lack either a semi-spike or a meteor smash) [[Special:Contributions/108.96.40.194|108.96.40.194]] 09:27, 7 November 2010 (EST) | ||
Also, how is Link so high when he doesn't have a semi-spike in Brawl, and his one meteor smash is extremely difficult to land and very situational while not being that strong? I think he should be one of the worst on the list. [[Special:Contributions/108.96.40.194|108.96.40.194]] 09:30, 7 November 2010 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:30, November 7, 2010
MK[edit]
He should be in top 10. He easily stage spikes. Also, have you seen Ganondorf in action?--MegaTron1XD
11:46, 6 November 2010 (EDT)
Spike Tier List?[edit]
Meteor smashes don't really count as spikes. I would seggest changing it to either Edge guarding list, Semi-spike list, or just plain Meteor list. Most of these characters should be in negligible tier since most don't have any spikes whatsoever. Doc King (talk) 21:56, 6 November 2010 (EDT)
Is this supposed to be a list of semi-spikes and meteor smashes, or just one of them? And wouldn't it be better to have the individual attacks listed instead of each character? (as a large amount lack either a semi-spike or a meteor smash) 108.96.40.194 09:27, 7 November 2010 (EST)
Also, how is Link so high when he doesn't have a semi-spike in Brawl, and his one meteor smash is extremely difficult to land and very situational while not being that strong? I think he should be one of the worst on the list. 108.96.40.194 09:30, 7 November 2010 (EST)
