For Fun: Difference between revisions

23 bytes added ,  8 months ago
m
mNo edit summary
 
Line 14: Line 14:


==Reception==
==Reception==
Because For Fun was deliberately designed for unbalanced "fun" play, it incurred far less scrutiny from players in contrast to [[For Glory]]. While much better-received than [[Basic Brawl]], it was met with some criticism, most notably the inability to usually play with fewer than four players (resulting in frequent online lag), as well as commonly hosting [[taunt match]]es despite the presence of a hard-coded [[taunt]] limit. On the other hand, casual players that enjoyed taunt matches believed that the attempts to restrict taunt matches were too heavy-handed, believing that the name "For Fun" implies that taunts and the like shouldn't be restricted. This would later be addressed with the addition of [[Battle Arena]]s in ''Ultimate'', allowing taunt matches to be played with impunity.
Because For Fun was deliberately designed for unbalanced "fun" play, it incurred far less scrutiny from players in contrast to [[For Glory]]. While much better-received than [[Basic Brawl]], it was met with some criticism, most notably the inability to usually play with fewer than four players (resulting in frequent online lag), as well as commonly hosting [[taunt match]]es despite the presence of a hard-coded [[taunt]] limit. On the other hand, casual players that enjoyed taunt matches believed that the attempts to restrict taunt matches were too heavy-handed, believing that the name "For Fun" implies that taunts and the like shouldn't be restricted. This would later be addressed with the addition of [[Battle Arena]]s in ''Ultimate'', allowing both player limits and taunt matches to be played with impunity.


==Gallery==
==Gallery==
6,220

edits