6,220
edits
mNo edit summary |
m (→Reception) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Reception== | ==Reception== | ||
Because For Fun was deliberately designed for unbalanced "fun" play, it incurred far less scrutiny from players in contrast to [[For Glory]]. While much better-received than [[Basic Brawl]], it was met with some criticism, most notably the inability to usually play with fewer than four players (resulting in frequent online lag), as well as commonly hosting [[taunt match]]es despite the presence of a hard-coded [[taunt]] limit. On the other hand, casual players that enjoyed taunt matches believed that the attempts to restrict taunt matches were too heavy-handed, believing that the name "For Fun" implies that taunts and the like shouldn't be restricted. This would later be addressed with the addition of [[Battle Arena]]s in ''Ultimate'', allowing taunt matches to be played with impunity. | Because For Fun was deliberately designed for unbalanced "fun" play, it incurred far less scrutiny from players in contrast to [[For Glory]]. While much better-received than [[Basic Brawl]], it was met with some criticism, most notably the inability to usually play with fewer than four players (resulting in frequent online lag), as well as commonly hosting [[taunt match]]es despite the presence of a hard-coded [[taunt]] limit. On the other hand, casual players that enjoyed taunt matches believed that the attempts to restrict taunt matches were too heavy-handed, believing that the name "For Fun" implies that taunts and the like shouldn't be restricted. This would later be addressed with the addition of [[Battle Arena]]s in ''Ultimate'', allowing both player limits and taunt matches to be played with impunity. | ||
==Gallery== | ==Gallery== |
edits