Smasher talk:Dark.Pch: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
m (1 revision: pages)
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
----
==Content issue==
This page was brought to my attention and I took the liberty of editing out all of the silly irrelevant parts. I have all the code saved from the previous version of the page, in case someone gets their knickers in a knot about it.--[[User:Brookman|Brookman]] 08:46, June 7, 2007 (EDT)
:Wow, you'd think that people would have the integrity of ''not'' insulting the player while editing his article... --[[User:Ankoku|Ankoku]] 13:14, June 7, 2007 (EDT)


== '''Content issue:''' ==
==Rewrite==
 
At the approval of Dark.Pch, I have rewritten this entire smashwiki in a much neater, proper, more expressive form of writing while preserving all of the ideas originlly expressed.  I do not think that the content of this article is a problem any longer. --[[User:ElfenLiedPeach]] 9:04, June 8, 2007 (EDT)
 
This page was brought to my attention and I took the liberty of editing out all of the silly irrelevant parts. --[[User:Brookman|Brookman]] 08:46, June 7, 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 22:19, October 1, 2010

Content issue[edit]

This page was brought to my attention and I took the liberty of editing out all of the silly irrelevant parts. I have all the code saved from the previous version of the page, in case someone gets their knickers in a knot about it.--Brookman 08:46, June 7, 2007 (EDT)

Wow, you'd think that people would have the integrity of not insulting the player while editing his article... --Ankoku 13:14, June 7, 2007 (EDT)

Rewrite[edit]

At the approval of Dark.Pch, I have rewritten this entire smashwiki in a much neater, proper, more expressive form of writing while preserving all of the ideas originlly expressed. I do not think that the content of this article is a problem any longer. --User:ElfenLiedPeach 9:04, June 8, 2007 (EDT)