Talk:Terry (SSBU): Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 20: Line 20:
[[User:Thecontributor22|Thecontributor22]] ([[User talk:Thecontributor22|talk]]) 16:26, February 10, 2020 (EST)
[[User:Thecontributor22|Thecontributor22]] ([[User talk:Thecontributor22|talk]]) 16:26, February 10, 2020 (EST)
:Sounds interesting enough. I'm no authority on if it's trivia-worthy but it's something i'd probably add to his trivia section, if it were up to me. [[User:Acgamer28|<span style="font-family:Courier;color:blue">'''Acgamer28'''</span>]] 16:52, February 10, 2020 (EST)
:Sounds interesting enough. I'm no authority on if it's trivia-worthy but it's something i'd probably add to his trivia section, if it were up to me. [[User:Acgamer28|<span style="font-family:Courier;color:blue">'''Acgamer28'''</span>]] 16:52, February 10, 2020 (EST)
== Smash Brothers ultimate is for good boys and girls==
Really do I really need to tell you there's alot of seguestive stuff and pronunciations.
==DarkStalker and Destany==
Highest ranked Terry players in Europe should be added as a significant players, no? <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:ESaintx|ESaintx]] ([[User talk:ESaintx|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ESaintx|contribs]]) 12:01, October 29, 2022 (EDT)</small>
:First, I have to emphasize that it's '''historically''' significant, not just significant, meaning that players added to these sections have seen consistent notable results at a national level and above for a long period of time. This was made so that we wouldn't have these sections crowded with every player that has seen at least one good result, which not only just bloats up the section but also makes the entire section moot when the category pages do that significantly better.
:Second, I don't like the idea of adding players solely because they were ranked on a power ranking, especially when we don't know how notable they are in the grand scheme of things. It's one of the major flaws that caused these sections to be bloated before we overhauled it - we were adding any player who was ranked on any notable ranking, and not looking at their performance in the grand scheme of things. Exceptions, however, are often made if a player is ranked high enough (eg top 50) on a notable global ranking such as the PGR.
:That being said, I can entertain the idea of DarkStalker, who is probably Europe's best Terry player but has little national/major results, not to mention how his only top 100 was Glutonny... who was both drunk and sandbagging as Ganondorf, which barely counts as a win. Destany I don't really agree with; he had a couple of really solid runs at nationals/majors such as DoKomi 2020 and e-Caribana, but most of his other major results have been a bit iffy (SSC, VCA) not to mention how he doesn't have any top 100 wins either: his run to 25th at COLOSSEL may look really good on paper, but Destany saw a best win of Sirknight, French depth who isn't even top 50 in Europe. Either way, I'll discuss this with others to see what their opinions are, in addition to just cleaning up Terry's historically significant section anyways since there are players on here who aren't really historically significant. [[User:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia;color: black;">Cookies</span>]][[File:CnC Signature.png|20px]][[User talk:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia; color: black;">Creme</span>]] 12:56, October 29, 2022 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 12:02, October 29, 2022

Incomplete edit summary[edit]

What I meant to put on my edit (I accidentally hit enter instead of the apostrophe) was "Yeah let's keep this off for now until we have confirmation". Awesomelink234, the Super Cool Gamer Leave a message if needed 15:27, September 14, 2019 (EDT)

CM: Round 3[edit]

So Terry DOESN'T fight King K. Rool, King Dedede, and Bowser as giants, and rather by their default sizes? NinTylo (talk) 15:46, November 9, 2019 (EST)

Should we make a page on the Buster Wolf freeze glitch?[edit]

It should be documented on the wiki as every other glitch in Ultimate has, but there’s also a page that specifically goes over freeze glitches (i.e. the Icies glitch in Melee). Would it be its own separate page or merged with the page I previously mentioned? PowerShield03 (talk) 17:42, November 14, 2019 (EST)

Competitive viability[edit]

How long should we wait to add information on Terry's competitive history? I understand that he is a very recent release, but this is just out of curiosity. Revbecca! FalcoHeadSSBM.png 12:27, December 18, 2019 (EST)

Canonical Move Names?[edit]

On Mega Man's and Wii Fit Trainer's Ultimate page Trivia sections, it points out that they are the only characters with canonical names for all of their moves (barring throws, and ledge and floor attacks).

All of Terry's moves (even his throws, but NOT his ledge or floor attacks) have names given to them by Sakurai (such as his up air, Somersault Kick, which is not one of Terry's original series moves). I want to know if any of this is worth noting in Terry's Trivia section. Thecontributor22 (talk) 16:26, February 10, 2020 (EST)

Sounds interesting enough. I'm no authority on if it's trivia-worthy but it's something i'd probably add to his trivia section, if it were up to me. Acgamer28 16:52, February 10, 2020 (EST)

Smash Brothers ultimate is for good boys and girls[edit]

Really do I really need to tell you there's alot of seguestive stuff and pronunciations.

DarkStalker and Destany[edit]

Highest ranked Terry players in Europe should be added as a significant players, no? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ESaintx (talkcontribs) 12:01, October 29, 2022 (EDT)

First, I have to emphasize that it's historically significant, not just significant, meaning that players added to these sections have seen consistent notable results at a national level and above for a long period of time. This was made so that we wouldn't have these sections crowded with every player that has seen at least one good result, which not only just bloats up the section but also makes the entire section moot when the category pages do that significantly better.
Second, I don't like the idea of adding players solely because they were ranked on a power ranking, especially when we don't know how notable they are in the grand scheme of things. It's one of the major flaws that caused these sections to be bloated before we overhauled it - we were adding any player who was ranked on any notable ranking, and not looking at their performance in the grand scheme of things. Exceptions, however, are often made if a player is ranked high enough (eg top 50) on a notable global ranking such as the PGR.
That being said, I can entertain the idea of DarkStalker, who is probably Europe's best Terry player but has little national/major results, not to mention how his only top 100 was Glutonny... who was both drunk and sandbagging as Ganondorf, which barely counts as a win. Destany I don't really agree with; he had a couple of really solid runs at nationals/majors such as DoKomi 2020 and e-Caribana, but most of his other major results have been a bit iffy (SSC, VCA) not to mention how he doesn't have any top 100 wins either: his run to 25th at COLOSSEL may look really good on paper, but Destany saw a best win of Sirknight, French depth who isn't even top 50 in Europe. Either way, I'll discuss this with others to see what their opinions are, in addition to just cleaning up Terry's historically significant section anyways since there are players on here who aren't really historically significant. CookiesCnC Signature.pngCreme 12:56, October 29, 2022 (EDT)