Talk:Spring 2019 PGRU: Difference between revisions
(x-factor rankings?) |
m (Text replacement - "" to "") |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==X-Factor== | ==X-Factor== | ||
Will we be adding X-Factor adjusted rankings, as has been done with the past PGRs back in Smash 4? [[User:ElusiveTranscendent|ElusiveTranscendent]] ([[User talk:ElusiveTranscendent|talk]]) 14: | Will we be adding X-Factor adjusted rankings, as has been done with the past PGRs back in Smash 4? [[User:ElusiveTranscendent|ElusiveTranscendent]] ([[User talk:ElusiveTranscendent|talk]]) 14:58, August 2, 2019 (EDT) | ||
I'm going to point out that the names on the X-factor ballot DO NOT necessarily mean those players were in the top 100. In the past rankings, the PGStats team has said they have put red herrings in the X-factor list, as many as 28 names one season. There's no doubt a majority of the names listed were top 100, but it seems to me a mirepresentation to name them all as top 100 when that was NEVER confirmed to be the case. I would recommend changing that section. <small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:TenebrousGenius|TenebrousGenius]] ([[User talk:TenebrousGenius|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TenebrousGenius|contribs]]) 12:27, August 23, 2019</small> | |||
:I literally just did that once you posted. And yes, if they aren't on the PGRU list or Area 51 they are not part of the list at all. [[User:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia;color: black;">Cookies</span>]][[File:CnC Signature.png|20px]][[User talk:Cookies and Creme|<span style="font-family: Georgia; color: black;">Creme</span>]] 12:30, August 23, 2019 (EDT) | |||
Well, what a coincidence. Glad that's fixed now. [[User talk:TenebrousGenius]] 12:36, August 23, 2019 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 16:40, September 4, 2021
X-Factor[edit]
Will we be adding X-Factor adjusted rankings, as has been done with the past PGRs back in Smash 4? ElusiveTranscendent (talk) 14:58, August 2, 2019 (EDT)
I'm going to point out that the names on the X-factor ballot DO NOT necessarily mean those players were in the top 100. In the past rankings, the PGStats team has said they have put red herrings in the X-factor list, as many as 28 names one season. There's no doubt a majority of the names listed were top 100, but it seems to me a mirepresentation to name them all as top 100 when that was NEVER confirmed to be the case. I would recommend changing that section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TenebrousGenius (talk • contribs) 12:27, August 23, 2019
- I literally just did that once you posted. And yes, if they aren't on the PGRU list or Area 51 they are not part of the list at all. CookiesCreme 12:30, August 23, 2019 (EDT)
Well, what a coincidence. Glad that's fixed now. User talk:TenebrousGenius 12:36, August 23, 2019 (EDT)