Talk:Chicago Power Rankings: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
m (Diamond444 moved page Talk:Chicago Melee Power Rankings to Talk:Chicago Power Rankings: Having two different pages for different game PRs is stupid.)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


[[User:Sveet|Sveet]] ([[User talk:Sveet|talk]]) 15:13, 2 November 2015 (EST)Sveet
[[User:Sveet|Sveet]] ([[User talk:Sveet|talk]]) 15:13, 2 November 2015 (EST)Sveet
:1. I'm not the site admin. Porple is. 2. Also, I'll support your actions, ONLY if you don't remove page content. OK? [[file:INoMedssig.png|20px]] <span style="text-shadow:0px 0px 3px red"><font face="Times New Roman">[[User:INoMed|<font color="red">'''INoMed'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:INoMed|<font color="red">'''''(Talk • '''''</font>]][[User:INoMed/Contribs|<font color="red">'''''Contribs)'''''</font>]]</sup></font></span> 15:16, 2 November 2015 (EST)
::INoMed, you're disregarding the evidence which was presented, which pretty clearly demonstrates Sveet's claim. "Don't remove page content" doesn't apply if the content is factually false. [[User:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="dodgerblue"><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;">'''Miles''']] <font color="silver">([[User talk:Miles of SmashWiki|<font color="silver">talk]])</font></font></span></font> 15:18, 2 November 2015 (EST)
So you agree with the facts, but you refuse to remove lies from your site?
[[User:Sveet|Sveet]] ([[User talk:Sveet|talk]]) 15:19, 2 November 2015 (EST)Sveet
:I'll remove the content, Miles has given the approval. [[User:Disaster Flare|<span style="color:Red; text-shadow: 0px 0px 3px red">'''Disaster'''</span> <span style="color:HotPink;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px hotpink">'''Flare'''</span>]] ''[[User talk:Disaster Flare|<span style="color:Orange;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px orange">(talk)</span>]]'' 15:20, 2 November 2015 (EST)
I think this arguement went out of control... [[file:INoMedssig.png|20px]] <span style="text-shadow:0px 0px 3px red"><font face="Times New Roman">[[User:INoMed|<font color="red">'''INoMed'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:INoMed|<font color="red">'''''(Talk • '''''</font>]][[User:INoMed/Contribs|<font color="red">'''''Contribs)'''''</font>]]</sup></font></span> 15:22, 2 November 2015 (EST)
:A little bit, yeah...at the very least, it's been resolved. [[User:Disaster Flare|<span style="color:Red; text-shadow: 0px 0px 3px red">'''Disaster'''</span> <span style="color:HotPink;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px hotpink">'''Flare'''</span>]] ''[[User talk:Disaster Flare|<span style="color:Orange;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px orange">(talk)</span>]]'' 15:22, 2 November 2015 (EST)

Latest revision as of 21:22, September 5, 2017

The information posted on this page is made up (no panels involved, no data collected or analysed, etc). There have been no official power rankings in Chicago since December 2011. I am leading the team that is updating the PR for 2015.

References:

2011 Chicago Power Rankings: http://smashboards.com/threads/chicago-land-power-rankings-updated-12-30-2011.288061/

Reddit post by "ChiSmash" that got him banned from /r/SSBM for posting fake information: https://www.reddit.com/r/SSBM/comments/3qw5gh/official_fallwinter_chicago_power_rankings/


Sveet (talk) 15:04, 2 November 2015 (EST)Sveet

Doesn't matter. Don't remove content. INoMedssig.png INoMed (Talk • Contribs) 15:04, 2 November 2015 (EST)
If what they're saying is valid, then the content shouldn't have been here to begin with. Miles (talk) 15:06, 2 November 2015 (EST)
They could have kept the content while they were working on a vew version... But no, they had to remove page content. INoMedssig.png INoMed (Talk • Contribs) 15:09, 2 November 2015 (EST)

INoMed, this information is 100% made up. There were no panels or data analysed. Someone simply made the username "ChiSmash" and posted legit-looking information and claimed it was official. I have already cited sources that prove this. This fake information should not remain on your site. I will update this with real information as we have it, but for now it is best to remove the harmful content.

Sveet (talk) 15:13, 2 November 2015 (EST)Sveet

1. I'm not the site admin. Porple is. 2. Also, I'll support your actions, ONLY if you don't remove page content. OK? INoMedssig.png INoMed (Talk • Contribs) 15:16, 2 November 2015 (EST)
INoMed, you're disregarding the evidence which was presented, which pretty clearly demonstrates Sveet's claim. "Don't remove page content" doesn't apply if the content is factually false. Miles (talk) 15:18, 2 November 2015 (EST)

So you agree with the facts, but you refuse to remove lies from your site?

Sveet (talk) 15:19, 2 November 2015 (EST)Sveet

I'll remove the content, Miles has given the approval. Disaster Flare (talk) 15:20, 2 November 2015 (EST)

I think this arguement went out of control... INoMedssig.png INoMed (Talk • Contribs) 15:22, 2 November 2015 (EST)

A little bit, yeah...at the very least, it's been resolved. Disaster Flare (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2015 (EST)
Retrieved from "https://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Chicago_Power_Rankings&oldid=992545"