Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first!
Notices
The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters.
When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted.
Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with.

Smasher talk:Holiday: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
I created my page just for fun as I really enjoy keeping track of statistics and thought it would be interesting to put them on here. I understand the concern and am fine with removal if its decided to remove it. Although I wanted to say that I have only listed larger scaled tournaments for the most part and little to no locals. I have seen smasher pages with only local results shown giving them higher placements and no nationals. Should they be allowed to be kept? If I change the page to reflect my local results will I be allowed to keep the page? In the end I am fine either way, just wanted to bring up that point. This was merely for fun.  
I created my page just for fun as I really enjoy keeping track of statistics and thought it would be interesting to put them on here. I understand the concern and am fine with removal if its decided to remove it. Although I wanted to say that I have only listed larger scaled tournaments for the most part and little to no locals. I have seen smasher pages with only local results shown giving them higher placements and no nationals. Should they be allowed to be kept? If I change the page to reflect my local results will I be allowed to keep the page? In the end I am fine either way, just wanted to bring up that point. This was merely for fun.  


Username:Holiday -  10:51am, 19 June 2017 (EDT)
[[User:Holiday]] -  10:51am, 19 June 2017 (EDT)

Revision as of 11:19, June 19, 2017

Deletion

Okay, so now that results are on...I can safely say I have doubts here. The PR might be notable to some extent, but the placings for the most part aren't great at all, and the only two links this guy has on the site are to a doubles and crew battle. I would delete this right away, but there are things like the PR ranking and such, so I feel the best course of action is to open a discussion on it. Note, however, that I am currently neutral about this, and merely posted the tag not out of certainty Holiday shouldn't be on here, but over concerns of how notable he is. Disaster Flare Disaster Flare signature image.png (talk) 23:09, 18 June 2017 (EDT)

Support His rankings are very poor, plus we have no data on any of the people he partnered with. He may have a PR spot, but ultimately, all he does is participate in tourneys without ever leaving an impact. Black Vulpine of the Furry Nation 00:16, 19 June 2017 (EDT)


Response to Deletion

I created my page just for fun as I really enjoy keeping track of statistics and thought it would be interesting to put them on here. I understand the concern and am fine with removal if its decided to remove it. Although I wanted to say that I have only listed larger scaled tournaments for the most part and little to no locals. I have seen smasher pages with only local results shown giving them higher placements and no nationals. Should they be allowed to be kept? If I change the page to reflect my local results will I be allowed to keep the page? In the end I am fine either way, just wanted to bring up that point. This was merely for fun.

User:Holiday - 10:51am, 19 June 2017 (EDT)