User talk:TheNuttyOne/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

User talk:TheNuttyOne/Archive 3 (view source)

Revision as of 15:56, January 27, 2016

25 bytes added , 9 years ago

m

→‎About the move: Oops.

Amber Blackstar

Rollbackers

20,573

edits

@@ Line 159: / Line 159: @@
 ::::We can get a solution later. Right now, you're making this an issue by constantly re-adding it and it's stressing all of us out because it's seeing no end. The reason we wait before re-adding a suggestion is so we have enough time to shed a new light on it. Re-adding it right after it's removed does not give us that luxury and only stresses us out. I'm just trying to follow the rules here, but you're making it an issue right now. [[User:Disaster Flare|<span style="color:Green; text-shadow: 0px 0px 3px green">'''Disaster'''</span> <span style="color:Blue;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px blue">'''Flare'''</span>]] [[File:Disaster Flare signature image.png|20px]] ''[[User talk:Disaster Flare|<span style="color:SkyBlue;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px skyblue">(talk)</span>]]'' 14:47, 27 January 2016 (EST)
 :::::Give me any rule that says 1) discussions cannot be reopened until a certain amount of time has passed or 2) discussion can be ended if an admin thinks it's stupid and I will admit that you are right and I am wrong. However, I am positive neither of those rules exist, so that puts you as much in the wrong as I am (and I will agree I overreacted there). <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|you]]. Or maybe [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]].</small>  14:51, 27 January 2016 (EST)
-::::::I might've overreacted a bit too, and I'm not saying either of those are rules, I'm just saying we need time before re-opening a discussion, because it gives us time to think about the idea of the move and maybe change our opinions later. It's not that we thought it was stupid, it's that it seemed to have no end, so we ended it to give some time for everybody to think about it first. I think our current policy on things like this when it comes to failing due to insufficient consensus is more than fair because of the fact that it's not like we can never suggest it again, but re-adding it and going against people's wishes when they ask not to re-add it, especially when it's an admin who all they're trying to do is prevent problems, it only creates issues. That's what I mean when I say I'm just following the rules. [[User:Disaster Flare|<span style="color:Green; text-shadow: 0px 0px 3px green">'''Disaster'''</span> <span style="color:Blue;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px blue">'''Flare'''</span>]] [[File:Disaster Flare signature image.png|20px]] ''[[User talk:Disaster Flare|<span style="color:SkyBlue;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px skyblue">(talk)</span>]]'' 14:55, 27 January 2016 (EST)
+::::::I might've overreacted a bit too, and I'm not saying either of those are rules, I'm just saying we need time before re-opening a discussion, because it gives us time to think about the idea of the move and maybe change our opinions later. It's not that we thought it was stupid, it's that it seemed to have no end, so we ended it to give some time for everybody to think about it first. I think our current policy on things like this when it comes to failing due to insufficient consensus is more than fair because of the fact that it's not like we can never suggest it again, but re-adding it right after it's removed and going against people's wishes when they ask not to re-add it, especially when it's an admin who all they're trying to do is prevent problems, it only creates issues. That's what I mean when I say I'm just following the rules. [[User:Disaster Flare|<span style="color:Green; text-shadow: 0px 0px 3px green">'''Disaster'''</span> <span style="color:Blue;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px blue">'''Flare'''</span>]] [[File:Disaster Flare signature image.png|20px]] ''[[User talk:Disaster Flare|<span style="color:SkyBlue;text-shadow:0px 0px 3px skyblue">(talk)</span>]]'' 14:55, 27 January 2016 (EST)