Talk:Rufio: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Serpent King (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I '''oppose''' per Joaco. Not knowing about something does not, in itself, warrant it's deletion. I was unaware of what this was, and after reading the article, I now know. It has a purpose and it should stay. <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:12pt">[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083">'''Serpent'''</span>]] [[File:SKSig.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0;">'''King'''</span></span>]] 04:07, 31 December 2015 (EST) | I '''oppose''' per Joaco. Not knowing about something does not, in itself, warrant it's deletion. I was unaware of what this was, and after reading the article, I now know. It has a purpose and it should stay. <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:12pt">[[User:Serpent King|<span style="color:#083">'''Serpent'''</span>]] [[File:SKSig.png|16px|link=]] [[User talk:Serpent King|<span style="color:#ed0;">'''King'''</span></span>]] 04:07, 31 December 2015 (EST) | ||
:'''Oppose''' per SK and Joaco. [[File:Nyargleblargle.png|16px]][[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color:LawnGreen">'''Nyargle</span>]][[User talk:Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: orange;">'''blargle'''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 09:05, 31 December 2015 (EST) |
Revision as of 09:05, December 31, 2015
I do believe that this combo is well used with Meta Knight but if it doesn't have a proper name, we could mention it on his character pages or in his moveset subpages. Dots (talk) The Jiggly 14:17, 26 December 2015 (EST)
- Found one. Drill Blaster Mark 2 (talk) 14:31, 26 December 2015 (EST)
- Bump, and Strong Support for deletion. It doesn't need this much detail. 98.157.202.185 15:05, 30 December 2015 (EST)
- Support Definitely deserves a mention on MK's pages, but I don't think it's notable enough to warrant its own page. Disaster Flare (talk) 15:07, 30 December 2015 (EST)
- Slight opposition I definitely agree with DF and anon, but let's not forget these two. Yes, I know they're Smash 64, but just because this one's Brawl doesn't make it any less important. Drill Blaster Mark 2 (talk) 15:19, 30 December 2015 (EST)
- The problem is unlike the two you mentioned, I've never even heard of this combo, which unfamiliarity in itself kinda hurts credibility. Disaster Flare (talk) 15:20, 30 December 2015 (EST)
- Smashboards didn't have a lot on this subject as well. I'll stick to my opinion, but I'm aware it's only a matter before the page gets deleted. Drill Blaster Mark 2 (talk) 16:54, 30 December 2015 (EST)
- Strong opposition This term is widely used between top players like ZeRo, Seibrik and Mew2King and this combo is very relevant in both games, as it's a core of Meta Knight's gameplay. Never hearing about the term is not a reason for deletion, actually Wiki pages are for people to learn things, like this term. There's absolutely no reason for deleting this page. Joaco (talk) 03:55, 31 December 2015 (EST)
- Smashboards didn't have a lot on this subject as well. I'll stick to my opinion, but I'm aware it's only a matter before the page gets deleted. Drill Blaster Mark 2 (talk) 16:54, 30 December 2015 (EST)
- The problem is unlike the two you mentioned, I've never even heard of this combo, which unfamiliarity in itself kinda hurts credibility. Disaster Flare (talk) 15:20, 30 December 2015 (EST)
- Slight opposition I definitely agree with DF and anon, but let's not forget these two. Yes, I know they're Smash 64, but just because this one's Brawl doesn't make it any less important. Drill Blaster Mark 2 (talk) 15:19, 30 December 2015 (EST)
- Support Definitely deserves a mention on MK's pages, but I don't think it's notable enough to warrant its own page. Disaster Flare (talk) 15:07, 30 December 2015 (EST)
- Bump, and Strong Support for deletion. It doesn't need this much detail. 98.157.202.185 15:05, 30 December 2015 (EST)
I oppose per Joaco. Not knowing about something does not, in itself, warrant it's deletion. I was unaware of what this was, and after reading the article, I now know. It has a purpose and it should stay. Serpent King 04:07, 31 December 2015 (EST)