Category talk:Games: Difference between revisions
(→More specific categories for images: new section) |
TheNuttyOne (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*Screenshots from non-Smash Bros. games | *Screenshots from non-Smash Bros. games | ||
124 files are a decently but not obscenely high number, so this recategorization shouldn't take that long. Would it be worth it, though? Other ideas/comments/possible categories? --[[User:Menshay|Menshay]] ([[User talk:Menshay|talk]]) 14:47, 17 November 2015 (EST) | 124 files are a decently but not obscenely high number, so this recategorization shouldn't take that long. Would it be worth it, though? Other ideas/comments/possible categories? --[[User:Menshay|Menshay]] ([[User talk:Menshay|talk]]) 14:47, 17 November 2015 (EST) | ||
:I can support this. <small>---Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:MyPage|<font color="brown">a turkey</font>]]! Or maybe [[User:DatNuttyKid|DatNuttyKid]].</small> 15:04, 17 November 2015 (EST) |
Revision as of 15:04, November 17, 2015
This category
Though I haven't looked through all the articles in this category, I don't think we really need this category. As I said in the Talk:Super Mario World page, articles summarizing additions to the Smash universe (or information irrelevant to any of the Smash games) could easily be explained in the character/stage/item/universe page itself, with a link to an appropriate Wikipedia article when necessary. I'm still somewhat new to the wiki scene, and I do appreciate the necessity of explanations, but this just seems redundant. WarxePB 02:36, September 8, 2007 (EDT)
- Try reading what Erik the Appreciator said. - Brawlmatt202 16:25, September 8, 2007 (EDT)
More specific categories for images
I think the images currently in this category could be split in more specific categories. The ones I'm thinking of, which would take care of most of the images, are:
- Box art (possibly including promotional art like that DK picture)
- Screenshots from non-Smash Bros. games
124 files are a decently but not obscenely high number, so this recategorization shouldn't take that long. Would it be worth it, though? Other ideas/comments/possible categories? --Menshay (talk) 14:47, 17 November 2015 (EST)
- I can support this. ---Preceding unsigned comment added by a turkey! Or maybe DatNuttyKid. 15:04, 17 November 2015 (EST)