User talk:Drilly Dilly/Archive 1

Hey. It's IronMaidMaryan. I'd just thought you'd like to know my account was hacked not too long and that whole situation with the Dr. Mario article wasn't of my volition. If I knew why, I'd tell you, but since I do not, all I can give is apologies for any inconveniences caused. Please know that's not what I wish on anybody. Thank you for your time. 15DollarsWentSouth (talk) 22:25, 18 August 2015 (EDT)

Really? Wow, I did not expect that. Your apology is accepted. - Drilly Dilly (talk) 22:58, 18 August 2015 (EDT)

"Heavyweight"

From where have you taken your definition of "heavyweight" being "heavier than 100"? Toomai Glittershine The Steppin' 23:53, 24 August 2015 (EDT)

I just prefer it be that way. Like I said, DeezNuts definitely learned his/her lesson about what they did. Besides, I think other people on the wiki can agree that heavyweight exceed 100 weight units. - Drilly Dilly (talk) 23:56, 24 August 2015 (EDT)

So it's just an opinion then? Where do you therefore mark "lightweight"? Is Shulk really a heavyweight from a non-technical point of view? Toomai Glittershine The Altruistic 09:32, 25 August 2015 (EDT)

Going by that logic, then that makes anyone over 95 almost heavyweights, which is in no way logical. Aidan, Master of Speed and Aura 09:41, 25 August 2015 (EDT)

To Aidan: not exactly. 100 is middleweight. Surpassing that is heavyweight. - Drilly Dilly (talk) 12:53, 25 August 2015 (EDT)

To Toonmai: I mark lightweights as characters weighing below 87. 87-90 are lightweight-medium. Drilly Dilly (talk) 12:53, 25 August 2015 (EDT)

Hey there

We typically do not write on vandal's talk pages unless good faith can be assumed. In this case, it can't. You may want to read over SW:QDV as your comment will likely provoke him, rather than deter him. Serpent∞King (talk) 23:43, 4 September 2015 (EDT)

I'll read it. Also, could you please use a gender-neutral pronoun (he/she or they)? It's considered sexist using only male pronouns. - Drilly Dilly (talk) 23:46, 4 September 2015 (EDT)

Honestly, for a vandal, I don't think it matters much. :P Serpent∞King (talk) 23:51, 4 September 2015 (EDT)

And what is that supposed to mean (then again, I can agree with you. Females aren't exactly vandalous like males when it comes to wikis.)? - Drilly Dilly (talk) 23:54, 4 September 2015 (EDT)

It means that I do not care about getting the right gender for a vandal. Serpent∞King (talk) 00:14, 5 September 2015 (EDT)

Then again, I guess you could use male pronouns when referring to vandals, because like I said, females aren't too vandalous compared to males. However, in general, when you refer to a normal person (one that isn't a vandal or antagonist) who you don't know the gender of, try to get into the habit of using gender-neutral pronouns. That would sound better. - Drilly Dilly (talk) 00:54, 5 September 2015 (EDT)

Spike vs Meteor smash

“	A spike is an attack that sends the opponent downwards but cannot have its knockback interrupted via meteor cancelling. As a result, they are significantly more dangerous than the similar meteor smash.	”
—Spike

-Aidan, Master of Speed and Aura 19:47, 14 September 2015 (EDT)

Yeah, I know. Samus's dair can be canceled, so it's a meteor. - Drilly Dilly (talk) 20:03, 14 September 2015 (EDT)

*Sneeze*

Oh this is funny. Check it. Smashedpotatoes (talk) 03:25, 20 September 2015 (EDT)

Them Gmod physics, though. - Drilly Dilly (talk) 03:26, 20 September 2015 (EDT)

About my edit you reverted

Hey, why did you revert my most recent edit on the Roy page? I was trying to make the page a bit easier to read. I noticed you did the same thing on the Zelda page, although that one was more so a matter of opinion. (Still, it was technically a violation of this.) John PK SMAAAASH!! 11:06, 22 September 2015 (EDT)

Here's a reminder that I would like to know why you reverted the edit. Like I said before, I removed some unnecessary run-on sentences and a bit of redundancy to make the page flow a little easier. John PK SMAAAASH!! 11:13, 24 September 2015 (EDT)

So, can you tell me why you reverted that edit? It's been a couple days now. John PK SMAAAASH!! 16:20, 26 September 2015 (EDT)

I've given you a lot of time now...John PK SMAAAASH!! 18:55, 4 October 2015 (EDT)

Okay, there does not seem to be any reason for you to continue to reverting my edits on the page in question. I have given you almost three weeks to give me an explanation. I will ask one of the moderators for a compromise solution if you don't answer this time. John PK SMAAAASH!! 11:16, 12 October 2015 (EDT)