674
edits
Tournament talk:EVO 2015: Difference between revisions
About that introductory paragraph...
m (→Sm4sh to 49th?) |
(About that introductory paragraph...) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
: I honestly think we should never list past top 32, but there's seems to be no written rule about this and every tournament page lists differently, for small tournaments.[[User:PFFP|PFFP]] ([[User talk:PFFP|talk]]) 18:19, 22 July 2015 (EDT) | : I honestly think we should never list past top 32, but there's seems to be no written rule about this and every tournament page lists differently, for small tournaments.[[User:PFFP|PFFP]] ([[User talk:PFFP|talk]]) 18:19, 22 July 2015 (EDT) | ||
==Messy introductory paragraph== | |||
I'd like to speak in favor of cleaning this page's introductory paragraph, to follow a better event page standard. I'm talking about the 4th and 5th paragraph actually, specially the 4th. Simply put, it's a mess. A giant block of text with no valuable and/or essential information. Most of what's written there is a description of what the results section shows, with informal and biased wording that can (and needs) to be reworked. | |||
I won't change anything right away, since I think this needs to be discussed first, but I needed to talk about it. Most of the content written there can be cut and the giant text wall defeats the purpose of a Wikipedia standard introductory paragraph: to be simple and present the basic/essentials of the event. The content there could be worked on the trivia section and/or better fleshed out on its own section, "Battle log notations" or "notable tournament moments". | |||
I want to rework the page to better fit the info, as an example of what I have in mind, but for that I need consensus on those two paragraphs. I think they're horrendous and need to go. [[User:PFFP|PFFP]] ([[User talk:PFFP|talk]]) 19:31, 23 July 2015 (EDT) | |||