Talk:Main Page/Archive 4: Difference between revisions
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
:::::::: I agree about the improvement drive idea. I guess AotW is already for quality articles, but I think it's important that we include a few links to some articles that are in some real need of expansion and that we think casual users can contribute to if they come across it. --[[User:Kirby King|<font color="red"><b><i>Kirby King</i></b></font>]] 19:08, February 18, 2007 (GMT) | :::::::: I agree about the improvement drive idea. I guess AotW is already for quality articles, but I think it's important that we include a few links to some articles that are in some real need of expansion and that we think casual users can contribute to if they come across it. --[[User:Kirby King|<font color="red"><b><i>Kirby King</i></b></font>]] 19:08, February 18, 2007 (GMT) | ||
:::: I kinda like that I put heal instead of edit, records instead of history and so on ^_^ {{User:AltAcnt/sig}} 19:36, February 18, 2007 (GMT) |
Revision as of 14:36, February 18, 2007
This page is for discussion about the Main Page. To discuss matters about SmashWiki in general, please find the appropriate venue via the Community Portal, or visit the Pool Room.
The general discussion previously on this page can be found on this archive page.
Browse SmashWiki
I took out the link to SmashWiki:Browse because it's redundant with the main page. Should we expand the main page a little bit, to perhaps include "Smashers" as a category, or maybe link to some Help topics? I plan to retouch the main page but I want to gather your opinions first. – MaskedMarth (t c) 17:56, February 5, 2007 (GMT)
- I'm not sure about including Smashers as a category, but I'm certainly open to other layouts for the Main Page. Maybe you could make a sample Main Page and put it as a subpage or a user page or something? Making the help section more obvious would make sense, I think. --Kirby King 20:36, February 5, 2007 (GMT)
Main Page seems bare
Shouldn't the main pageinclude stuff, like, the current number of articles, and maybe, perhaps, an article of the day/week? I'm just wondering, as mostother Wiki have those sort of things. It's a work in progress, right? There will be stuff like that eventually, right?
-Brawlmatt202, Feb. 6, 2007
- That's a good point. The "article of the week" sounds like a good idea, and I think Alt's old wiki had something like "did you know?" that would be interesting to incorporate, too. Since we're still in development (hmm, maybe we should include that fact in the main page!), I'd say it's better to brainstorm a little before making any big changes, as long as we have a bombastic main page when SmashWiki is fully released. – MaskedMarth (t c) 04:30, February 7, 2007 (GMT)
- I think articles of the week were discussed before. The problem was that we don't have many really good articles. Probably not enough to do without recurring pages. Development must be mentioned very subtily, if at all. We don't want a big posterboard board which basically screams "Wait! It's not done yet!" What exactly would the "Did you know?" incorporate? It seems like it could definitely be decent filler. -- Bean 06:42, February 7, 2007 (GMT)
- Well, Smiddle's old wiki can be found here. So that's the type of "did you know" information we might have. – MaskedMarth (t c) 03:32, February 8, 2007 (GMT)
- Did you know, that Luigi's voice is in fact a sped up version of Mario's from Mario 64? I like the Did you know, and hell, I already learned something. I think it's a good idea. -- Bean 04:45, February 8, 2007 (GMT)
- An article of the week (or day, or whatever) would be great, and an article counter would be perfect for measuring how close the site is to being "done." WaluigiIsAwesome 02:16, February 10, 2007 (GMT)
- Also, having articles of the week will encourage better contributions and editing. In theory anyway. -- Randall00 20:23, February 15, 2007 (GMT)
- I certainly think so. I don't think an article of the week has to be a particularly good one, perhaps we can use such a feature to encourage a week's worth of activity to an article that desperately needs the thought. AOTW could be used more as an improvement drive than a quality showcase. I think the first such article should be one of the main game modes to the original Super Smash Bros to start with. Erik the Appreciator 04:53, February 16, 2007 (GMT)
- I agree about the improvement drive idea. I guess AotW is already for quality articles, but I think it's important that we include a few links to some articles that are in some real need of expansion and that we think casual users can contribute to if they come across it. --Kirby King 19:08, February 18, 2007 (GMT)
- I kinda like that I put heal instead of edit, records instead of history and so on ^_^ – Smiddle ( Talk • Conts ) 19:36, February 18, 2007 (GMT)