[dismiss]
| Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first! |
| Notices |
|---|
| The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters. |
| When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted. |
| Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with. |
Talk:Shulk (SSB4): Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Mr. Mittens (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I think Shulk is being considered a third-party... his stage appears in both versions, which is shared only with Mega Man and Punch-Out! (although the Boxing Ring has a Smash version, which could explain that), on the roster (which still isn't considered real, but still) he's placed with Pac-Man, Mega Man, and Sonic, and is the only character besides them located there. And he's technically owned by Monolith Soft, even though they were bought by Nintendo prior to his reveal. Thoughts? '''[[User:Nutta Butta|...a new Nutta]]'''[[File:Nutta's Mallo sig.png]]'''[[User talk:Nutta Butta|is approaching...]]''' 12:29, 30 August 2014 (EDT) | I think Shulk is being considered a third-party... his stage appears in both versions, which is shared only with Mega Man and Punch-Out! (although the Boxing Ring has a Smash version, which could explain that), on the roster (which still isn't considered real, but still) he's placed with Pac-Man, Mega Man, and Sonic, and is the only character besides them located there. And he's technically owned by Monolith Soft, even though they were bought by Nintendo prior to his reveal. Thoughts? '''[[User:Nutta Butta|...a new Nutta]]'''[[File:Nutta's Mallo sig.png]]'''[[User talk:Nutta Butta|is approaching...]]''' 12:29, 30 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
:And yet Nintendo only owns 37% (I believe) of whoever officially owns Pokemon, I don't know why Shulk's down there (My guess is because they're gonna throw the series with one rep down there.), but I doubt it's be because he's third party. Also, by the logic of him having his stage on both versions, why doesn't Sonic have HIS stage in both versions? Or Pac-Man? He got two different stages. (Which isn't odd) It's most likely on both versions due to the upcoming Xenoblade Port. (Or it was conveniently less work because of this) Also, Namco owned Monolith soft, prior to nintendo buying them (I think they actually own 3% of them), so him being down there could be a little reference to that. [[User:Laikue|Laikue]] ([[User talk:Laikue|talk]]) 13:04, 30 August 2014 (EDT) | :And yet Nintendo only owns 37% (I believe) of whoever officially owns Pokemon, I don't know why Shulk's down there (My guess is because they're gonna throw the series with one rep down there.), but I doubt it's be because he's third party. Also, by the logic of him having his stage on both versions, why doesn't Sonic have HIS stage in both versions? Or Pac-Man? He got two different stages. (Which isn't odd) It's most likely on both versions due to the upcoming Xenoblade Port. (Or it was conveniently less work because of this) Also, Namco owned Monolith soft, prior to nintendo buying them (I think they actually own 3% of them), so him being down there could be a little reference to that. [[User:Laikue|Laikue]] ([[User talk:Laikue|talk]]) 13:04, 30 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
::Monolith has become a direct subsidieary company of Nintendo, helping with development of several EAD titles, so labeling Shulk and Xenoblade as third party would be inaccurate. It's possible that he's grouped with the third parties because they simply didn't have any other room for him, but I'm actually of the opinion that the leaked roster screens don't depict the full list of characters, because some of the clone characters are noticeably out of position. [[User:Mr. Mittens|Mr. Mittens]] ([[User talk:Mr. Mittens|talk]]) 14:33, 30 August 2014 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:33, August 30, 2014
I have a screenshotted pic of Shulk. It's only a headshot really, but it works. How can I get it on his SSB4 page? BrittF (talk) 21:41, 25 August 2014 (EDT) BrittF
- Um... you add it? You have to upload said image first, but then you just... idk, add it. ...a new Nutta
is approaching... 21:41, 25 August 2014 (EDT) - Sorry... I am super new to this "wiki" stuff. BrittF (talk) 21:44, 25 August 2014 (EDT) BrittF
- your not alone there, the pictures on the leaked characters took forever to get on Thesupernintendokid (talk) 21:57, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
Shouldn't we have a page for Metal Face? He was hinted to be a stage boss in his trailer. --73.160.5.100 15:43, 29 August 2014 (EDT)
Third-Party?
I think Shulk is being considered a third-party... his stage appears in both versions, which is shared only with Mega Man and Punch-Out! (although the Boxing Ring has a Smash version, which could explain that), on the roster (which still isn't considered real, but still) he's placed with Pac-Man, Mega Man, and Sonic, and is the only character besides them located there. And he's technically owned by Monolith Soft, even though they were bought by Nintendo prior to his reveal. Thoughts? ...a new Nutta
is approaching... 12:29, 30 August 2014 (EDT)
- And yet Nintendo only owns 37% (I believe) of whoever officially owns Pokemon, I don't know why Shulk's down there (My guess is because they're gonna throw the series with one rep down there.), but I doubt it's be because he's third party. Also, by the logic of him having his stage on both versions, why doesn't Sonic have HIS stage in both versions? Or Pac-Man? He got two different stages. (Which isn't odd) It's most likely on both versions due to the upcoming Xenoblade Port. (Or it was conveniently less work because of this) Also, Namco owned Monolith soft, prior to nintendo buying them (I think they actually own 3% of them), so him being down there could be a little reference to that. Laikue (talk) 13:04, 30 August 2014 (EDT)
- Monolith has become a direct subsidieary company of Nintendo, helping with development of several EAD titles, so labeling Shulk and Xenoblade as third party would be inaccurate. It's possible that he's grouped with the third parties because they simply didn't have any other room for him, but I'm actually of the opinion that the leaked roster screens don't depict the full list of characters, because some of the clone characters are noticeably out of position. Mr. Mittens (talk) 14:33, 30 August 2014 (EDT)
