Forum:MLG affiliation: Difference between revisions

Forum:MLG affiliation (edit)

349 bytes added , 10 years ago

no edit summary

316

edits

Revision as of 14:44, June 3, 2014 (edit) Toomai (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:58, June 3, 2014 (edit) (undo) Ryxis (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 45:		Line 45:

	If indeed this is nothing but "affiliation", I see no issue with this. But any terms that require a change in our policies, focus, or appearance would put a serious dent in my interest. We need more information. [[User:Toomai\|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai\|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png\|20px\|link=User:Toomai/Bin\|???]] The Quiet 15:44, 3 June 2014 (EDT)		If indeed this is nothing but "affiliation", I see no issue with this. But any terms that require a change in our policies, focus, or appearance would put a serious dent in my interest. We need more information. [[User:Toomai\|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai\|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png\|20px\|link=User:Toomai/Bin\|???]] The Quiet 15:44, 3 June 2014 (EDT)

			As everyone else said, that sounds great, but we need more details. Very promising for an increase in traffic and appearing more refined, but if they start trying to take jurisdiction over content on pages that doesn't align with their agenda, then that sounds pretty balls. [[User:Ryxis\|Ryxis]] ([[User talk:Ryxis\|talk]]) 15:58, 3 June 2014 (EDT)