[dismiss]
Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first! |
Notices |
---|
The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters. |
When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted. |
Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with. |
Forum:RfA Proposal: Difference between revisions
From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New Page: {{Forumheader|Watercooler}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> In an attempt to encourage discussion of how the RfA process...) |
m (1 revision: pages) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
In an attempt to encourage discussion of how the RfA process could be changed and in an attempt to lift and displace some of the heavy argument that's been happening, I've written up a proposal on how the RfA policy could be changed, found at [[User:Semicolon/Requests for Adminship Proposal]]. Love it, hate it, whatever. I'm trying to encourage debate about how it can be changed or compromised or amended. Flame away. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 20:24, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | In an attempt to encourage discussion of how the RfA process could be changed and in an attempt to lift and displace some of the heavy argument that's been happening, I've written up a proposal on how the RfA policy could be changed, found at [[User:Semicolon/Requests for Adminship Proposal]]. Love it, hate it, whatever. I'm trying to encourage debate about how it can be changed or compromised or amended. Flame away. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 20:24, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I have an alternative rewrite found [[User:Shadowcrest/policy/RFA|here]], for the reasons listed at [[User talk:Semicolon/Requests for Adminship Proposal]]. --[[User:Shadowcrest|<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="Steelblue">Shadowcrest</font>]] 06:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 22:45, October 1, 2010
Forums: Index → Watercooler → RfA Proposal
In an attempt to encourage discussion of how the RfA process could be changed and in an attempt to lift and displace some of the heavy argument that's been happening, I've written up a proposal on how the RfA policy could be changed, found at User:Semicolon/Requests for Adminship Proposal. Love it, hate it, whatever. I'm trying to encourage debate about how it can be changed or compromised or amended. Flame away. Semicolon (talk) 20:24, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
- I have an alternative rewrite found here, for the reasons listed at User talk:Semicolon/Requests for Adminship Proposal. --Shadowcrest 06:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC)