2,149
edits
(New Page: {{Forumheader|Watercooler}}<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> In an attempt to encourage discussion of how the RfA process...) |
Shadowcrest (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
In an attempt to encourage discussion of how the RfA process could be changed and in an attempt to lift and displace some of the heavy argument that's been happening, I've written up a proposal on how the RfA policy could be changed, found at [[User:Semicolon/Requests for Adminship Proposal]]. Love it, hate it, whatever. I'm trying to encourage debate about how it can be changed or compromised or amended. Flame away. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 20:24, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | In an attempt to encourage discussion of how the RfA process could be changed and in an attempt to lift and displace some of the heavy argument that's been happening, I've written up a proposal on how the RfA policy could be changed, found at [[User:Semicolon/Requests for Adminship Proposal]]. Love it, hate it, whatever. I'm trying to encourage debate about how it can be changed or compromised or amended. Flame away. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 20:24, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I have an alternative rewrite found [[User:Shadowcrest/policy/RFA|here]], for the reasons listed at [[User talk:Semicolon/Requests for Adminship Proposal]]. --[[User:Shadowcrest|<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="Steelblue">Shadowcrest</font>]] 06:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC) |
edits