Talk:Vacuum (disambiguation): Difference between revisions
(→Merge: new section) |
m (→Merge: Support) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
'''Merge''' into Push and rename the page Pushing and Pulling. --[[User:RoyboyX|<font color="red">'''Roy'''</font><font color="gray">'''boy'''</font><font color="darkred">'''X'''</font>]] [[User talk:RoyboyX|''<span style="color:brown;">'''Talk'''</span>'']] 21:33, 21 November 2012 (EST) | '''Merge''' into Push and rename the page Pushing and Pulling. --[[User:RoyboyX|<font color="red">'''Roy'''</font><font color="gray">'''boy'''</font><font color="darkred">'''X'''</font>]] [[User talk:RoyboyX|''<span style="color:brown;">'''Talk'''</span>'']] 21:33, 21 November 2012 (EST) | ||
'''Merge''' Yeah, definitely, we don't really need one pushing and one pulling page. I support this. --[[User:Airconny|<font color="blue">'''Airconny'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Airconny|talk]]) 21:38, 21 November 2012 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 21:38, November 21, 2012
Unofficial lingo
If anyone can think of a better name, go for it, but I 'don't see how "Vacuum" is unofficial lingo any more than "knockback" or "frozen"...-Gargomon251 23:49, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I would think "Suction" would have been a better choice, but both "Knockback" and "Frozen" have been used by official sources. Vacuum is still unofficial lingo. FyreNWater - (Talk • Contributions ) 04:38, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Gale Boomerang
So wait Link's Gale Boomerang doesn't fall under this category? Also I think Wario-Man has a Vacuum like attack.Phildisaster (talk) 19:30, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Uhhhh is this really worthy of a full page? Zmario (talk) 21:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
reversed vacuum??
What are we gonna do with attacks like mr game and watch's up aerial, gale boomerang, ness's PSI magnet, toon link's down aerial, F.L.U.D.D. etc. (Majorabrawl (talk) 04:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC))
- I think since it's the same effect (just in reverse) it should be put into a new section of the article.–Entrea Sumatae 04:25, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe the article should be renamed "Wind" or something. It would be able to cover all moves that cause things to be pushed and pulled. Toomai (talk) 14:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Does sonic's up smash count as a vacuum? ~Teh Blue
Blur~... ~Sonic Boom!~ 16:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Merge
NO Why? They are different concepts; one repels, the other attracts. Friedbeef1 Love 23:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- Why we dont merge the 2 articles into another that have the two effects?? Majorabrawl (talk) 00:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Which you would name what? I like my solution more. Miles (talk) 00:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- So do I. ;P Friedbeef1 Love 00:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Which you would name what? I like my solution more. Miles (talk) 00:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Strength
Should we label the moves as how strong their pull effect is? I know Wario-Man's Up smash has a strong pull, and that it also pulls the opponent off the ground being so strong. Learner4 (talk) 16:59, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's really hard to quantify that - Gargomon251 (talk) 02:28, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Merge
Merge into Push and rename the page Pushing and Pulling. --RoyboyX Talk 21:33, 21 November 2012 (EST)
Merge Yeah, definitely, we don't really need one pushing and one pulling page. I support this. --Airconny (talk) 21:38, 21 November 2012 (EST)
