7,049
edits
User talk:Mousehunter321/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
→Undoing Edits
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
I checked the Sonic page and I see you undid the edit about the infamous April Fools Day joke. While I'm not mad at you or anything I would like to know your reason for undoing it and what you meant by "Duplicate Content". Also, Every other Pokemon character lists their species as who they are. (i.e. Pikachu's species is Pikachu, Pichu's species is Pichu, etc.) Why should Lucario be any different? I did check the Bulbapedia article but "Lucario" is more specific and accurate. Again, I'm not mad at you at all. I just would like you to explain your reasoning for undoing them. [[User:ChuckNorris24|ChuckNorris24]] ([[User talk:ChuckNorris24|talk]]) 17:48, 9 July 2012 (EDT) | I checked the Sonic page and I see you undid the edit about the infamous April Fools Day joke. While I'm not mad at you or anything I would like to know your reason for undoing it and what you meant by "Duplicate Content". Also, Every other Pokemon character lists their species as who they are. (i.e. Pikachu's species is Pikachu, Pichu's species is Pichu, etc.) Why should Lucario be any different? I did check the Bulbapedia article but "Lucario" is more specific and accurate. Again, I'm not mad at you at all. I just would like you to explain your reasoning for undoing them. [[User:ChuckNorris24|ChuckNorris24]] ([[User talk:ChuckNorris24|talk]]) 17:48, 9 July 2012 (EDT) | ||
:By duplicate content I meant that you just copied the section from the [[list of rumors]] article and pasted it onto the [[Sonic the Hedgehog]] page. If you're willing to write a summary of the rumor, that's fine, but having two articles display the exact same content without reason looks unprofessional. About the Pokémon thing: I think the confusion stemmed from the fact that some pages had the Pokémon name, while others gave a more descriptive species, and as the issue was never resolved, gradually the pages were changed over to their current state. It is my belief that while a Pokémon's species is its "name", as in Pikachu's species is "Pikachu", it's more informative if we followed Bulbapedia's convention and used a term such as "Mouse Pokémon" for the species. Otherwise, there would be little purpose in having "species" in the infobox. [[User:Mousehunter321|<font face="Calibri">Mousehunter321</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Mousehunter321|<font face="Calibri">talk</font>]] · [[Special:Contributions/Mousehunter321|<font face="Calibri">contributions</font>]])</small> 17:56, 9 July 2012 (EDT) | |||