Talk:Dragon King: The Fighting Game: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (stop edit warring; the info is relevant) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:I did no such thing. [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="darkorange">'''Toast'''</font>]] [[File:Wii U Logo Transparent.png|17px|link=Special:Contributions/ToastUltimatum]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="seablue">'''ltimatum'''</font>]][[File:Transparent Swadloon.png|26px]] 15:36, 25 December 2011 (EST) | :I did no such thing. [[User:ToastUltimatum|<font color="darkorange">'''Toast'''</font>]] [[File:Wii U Logo Transparent.png|17px|link=Special:Contributions/ToastUltimatum]][[User talk:ToastUltimatum|<font color="seablue">'''ltimatum'''</font>]][[File:Transparent Swadloon.png|26px]] 15:36, 25 December 2011 (EST) | ||
::Never Mind.>_> [[User:Marioisawesome118|Marioisawesome118]] ([[User talk:Marioisawesome118|talk]]) 15:38, 25 December 2011 (EST)[[File:MarioHeadSSBM.png|19px]] | ::Never Mind.>_> [[User:Marioisawesome118|Marioisawesome118]] ([[User talk:Marioisawesome118|talk]]) 15:38, 25 December 2011 (EST)[[File:MarioHeadSSBM.png|19px]] | ||
[[User:BlindColours]], why do you keep reverting [[User:Marioisawesome118]]'s edit? You both would do well to read [[SW:1RV]], especially BlindColours, as you've been [http://www.ssbwiki.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=User%3ABlindColours&year=&month=-1 blocked] for violating it in the past. As to the content of Marioisawesome118's edit, the information that there was only one stage completed cannot be found anywhere else in the article; thus, it is relevant. [[User:Mousehunter321|<font face="Calibri">Mousehunter321</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Mousehunter321|<font face="Calibri">talk</font>]] · [[Special:Contributions/Mousehunter321|<font face="Calibri">contributions</font>]])</small> 17:23, 29 December 2011 (EST) |
Revision as of 17:23, December 29, 2011
Could someone put a space between the : and The? Forbidden7 20:40, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
Is this necessary
I know this was the original idea for Super Smash Bros, but do we really need a whole article to this? Especially since so little is actually known about it. Mr. Anon (talk) 21:07, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
- I think so. Nobody seems to oppose. Forbidden7 21:11, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
- Oppose, original Smash Bros. idea is certainly worth noting. DoctorPain99 {ROLLBACKER} 21:25, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
- I think it's relevant, and should at least be merged with SSB if it can't have its own article. Blue Ninjakoopa(Talk) 21:30, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
- I think its better as its own article, and are these opposes opposing deleting the article? Forbidden7 21:57, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
I think this is a important article to have as it's important to the series' history. Toomai Glittershine The Metroid 22:01, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
- Thank you Toomai. Besides, this has more info on DK:TFG than beta elements. Forbidden7 22:03, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
My edit
Why was it unnecessary?--PSIWolf (T • C • E) 12:05, 10 August 2011 (EDT)
- The fact that it was released in 1999 is not relevant to DK:TFG. Simple as that. Blindcolours ZoOm! 12:08, 10 August 2011 (EDT)
Um
There should a reason why the game was unfinished. Marioisawesome118 (talk) 15:20, 25 December 2011 (EST)
- There is. It turned into Super Smash Bros.. Toast ltimatum 15:22, 25 December 2011 (EST)
Um, Toast, why did revert my signature? Marioisawesome118 (talk) 15:34, 25 December 2011 (EST)
- I did no such thing. Toast ltimatum 15:36, 25 December 2011 (EST)
- Never Mind.>_> Marioisawesome118 (talk) 15:38, 25 December 2011 (EST)
User:BlindColours, why do you keep reverting User:Marioisawesome118's edit? You both would do well to read SW:1RV, especially BlindColours, as you've been blocked for violating it in the past. As to the content of Marioisawesome118's edit, the information that there was only one stage completed cannot be found anywhere else in the article; thus, it is relevant. Mousehunter321 (talk · contributions) 17:23, 29 December 2011 (EST)