| Welcome to SmashWiki! Log in or create an account and join the community, and don't forget to read this first! |
| Notices |
|---|
| The Skill parameter has been removed from Smasher infoboxes, and in its place are the new "Best historical ranking" and "Best tournament result" parameters. SmashWiki needs help adding these new parameters to Smasher infoboxes, refer to the guidelines here for what should be included in these new parameters. |
| When adding results to Smasher pages, include each tournament's entrant number in addition to the player's placement, and use the {{Trn}} template with the matching game specified. Please also fix old results on Smasher pages that do not abide to this standard. Refer to our Smasher article guidelines to see how results tables should be formatted. |
| Check out our project page for ongoing projects that SmashWiki needs help with. |
Forum:Old user pages: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::'''Neutral''' Both Toast and PoD have some good arguments, but I must hear more before I decide. <font face="Jokerman">[[User:BlindColours|<font color="#FF0000">Blin</font>]][[User talk:BlindColours|<font color="#FFFFFF">dCol</font>]][[Special:Contributions/BlindColours|<font color="#00FFFF">ours</font>]]</font> ''Thank you for reading my sig.'' 09:32, 23 October 2011 (EDT) | :::'''Neutral''' Both Toast and PoD have some good arguments, but I must hear more before I decide. <font face="Jokerman">[[User:BlindColours|<font color="#FF0000">Blin</font>]][[User talk:BlindColours|<font color="#FFFFFF">dCol</font>]][[Special:Contributions/BlindColours|<font color="#00FFFF">ours</font>]]</font> ''Thank you for reading my sig.'' 09:32, 23 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
::::'''Neutral''' I am one for removing clutter, but maybe redirect them to a page like [[User:Inactive user]]. --[[User:RoyboyX|<font color="red">'''Roy'''</font><font color="gray">'''boy'''</font><font color="darkred">'''X'''</font>]][[File:RoyHeadSSBM.png|20px]] [[User talk:RoyboyX|''<span style="color:brown;">'''Talk'''</span>'']] 09:55, 23 October 2011 (EDT) | ::::'''Neutral''' I am one for removing clutter, but maybe redirect them to a page like [[User:Inactive user]]. --[[User:RoyboyX|<font color="red">'''Roy'''</font><font color="gray">'''boy'''</font><font color="darkred">'''X'''</font>]][[File:RoyHeadSSBM.png|20px]] [[User talk:RoyboyX|''<span style="color:brown;">'''Talk'''</span>'']] 09:55, 23 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
'''Oppose.''' Deleting a page doesn't magically cause it to take up less space; how would you be able to undelete it otherwise? It's also possible that, depending on the exact coding of the wiki, deleted pages actually have a higher computational overhead to process for things like links, [[Special:AllPages]], and so on. Since I believe the primary justification is flawed, and I can't think of another advantage significant enough to overcome the arduous process of doing this, I oppose. [[User:Toomai|Toomai]] [[User talk:Toomai|Glittershine]] [[Image:Toomai.png|20px|link=User:Toomai/Bin|???]] The Superlative 10:03, 23 October 2011 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:03, October 23, 2011
When the entire wiki was copied over from Wikia to here, every single namespace was moved, including user pages. This means that there are a ton of user pages on the wiki for users who don't have accounts here. I vote we delete them. Talk pages are different, as they usually pertain to edits the user has made, edits which were carried over in the move, so they would stay. I'm talking about pages like this. That's 10K that NIWA really doesn't need on their servers. 10K doesn't seem like much, but it'll add up across the wiki. Not sure how we'd go about doing it, I'm just throwing the idea out there. PenguinofDeath 08:13, 23 October 2011 (EDT)
- I'll say Slight Oppose. You had a long abscense but came back, so any of these users could do the same. And it'll cause red links in some places that would've been blue before. Though I suppose it shouldn't matter too much if they were deleted, so only a slight oppose. ToastUltimatum
Complaints Box 08:19, 23 October 2011 (EDT)
- I was something like the 21st user to create an account. These are people who don't have accounts. And if they do come back and make an account with exactly the same username, they can either make a new user page, or ask for the old one to be restored. PenguinofDeath 08:30, 23 October 2011 (EDT)
- Neutral Both Toast and PoD have some good arguments, but I must hear more before I decide. BlindColours Thank you for reading my sig. 09:32, 23 October 2011 (EDT)
- Neutral I am one for removing clutter, but maybe redirect them to a page like User:Inactive user. --RoyboyX
Talk 09:55, 23 October 2011 (EDT)
- Neutral I am one for removing clutter, but maybe redirect them to a page like User:Inactive user. --RoyboyX
- Neutral Both Toast and PoD have some good arguments, but I must hear more before I decide. BlindColours Thank you for reading my sig. 09:32, 23 October 2011 (EDT)
- I was something like the 21st user to create an account. These are people who don't have accounts. And if they do come back and make an account with exactly the same username, they can either make a new user page, or ask for the old one to be restored. PenguinofDeath 08:30, 23 October 2011 (EDT)
Oppose. Deleting a page doesn't magically cause it to take up less space; how would you be able to undelete it otherwise? It's also possible that, depending on the exact coding of the wiki, deleted pages actually have a higher computational overhead to process for things like links, Special:AllPages, and so on. Since I believe the primary justification is flawed, and I can't think of another advantage significant enough to overcome the arduous process of doing this, I oppose. Toomai Glittershine 
The Superlative 10:03, 23 October 2011 (EDT)
