6
edits
(→PLEASE PUT THIS TO FULL PROTECTION LEVEL!: Responded to IP) |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:reasoning? <span style="font-family:vivaldi; font-size:12pt">[[User:Shadowcrest|<span style="color:#4682b4">Shadowcrest</span>]]</span> 23:10, December 3, 2009 (UTC) | :reasoning? <span style="font-family:vivaldi; font-size:12pt">[[User:Shadowcrest|<span style="color:#4682b4">Shadowcrest</span>]]</span> 23:10, December 3, 2009 (UTC) | ||
::What if a vandal created an account, waited a few days, then altered the tier so Ganon was number one? [[Special:Contributions/98.117.158.220|98.117.158.220]] 23:49, December 6, 2009 (UTC) | ::What if a vandal created an account, waited a few days, then altered the tier so Ganon was number one? [[Special:Contributions/98.117.158.220|98.117.158.220]] 23:49, December 6, 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::It's very annoying for a vandal to try to create an account, wait four days, do it, get blocked and have their "contributions" undone, change IPs and repeat. It would be a waste of time, plus they'd forget or stop out of frustration. Hence, the reason why semi-protect exists in the first place. That argument doesn't work; again, why would we need full protection? '''[[User:RAN1|<font color="darkred">R</font>]][[User talk:RAN1|<font color="navy">A</font>]][[Special:Contributions/RAN1|<font color="darkgreen">N</font>]]1''' 01:24, December 7, 2009 (UTC) |
edits