3,883
edits
Forum:Metaknight's hidden flaw (very well hidden indeed): Difference between revisions
Forum:Metaknight's hidden flaw (very well hidden indeed) (edit)
Revision as of 14:24, January 27, 2009
, 15 years agono edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
*'this conversation is a waste' I don't think so, because I hope you're learning something. | *'this conversation is a waste' I don't think so, because I hope you're learning something. | ||
*Take some science classes. Sincerely, [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 18:26, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | *Take some science classes. Sincerely, [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 18:26, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
You know, I think it's pretty amusing how you never actually refute any of our points except to rant that PK and ESP exist. You see, there are three parts to an argument, the claim, the warrant, and the impact. I'll diagram one of my arguments from above with this in mind to show you. My claim: "The only evidence that you provided for PK being real is this one person's site. His site fails to prove that PK exists." That's a claim. It has no backing; that's what the warrants are for. My warrants: (1) It is easy to show the first part of the statement to be true simply by looking at your above comments. (2) The "test" image is not fully describe in function, so there is no measurable way to record and analyze the data. (3) He shows no record of the recorded data from this image, so there is no way to reference it. (4) Just saying that one person has had the "right" answer ten times in a row proves nothing as statistics show that this should happen at least once a week. You see, all of those back up my previous claim. Now the impact. This is what the claim being true means. What's the impact of this? Quite simply, PK doesn't exists, as the only piece of real evidence you've put forward has been debunked. Now for your arguments. All you have is a claim. No backing to that claim, and no impact of what it means. I'll say this again: ''every major scientific test has shown PK and ESP to be false. In the few that initially showed that it might be real, further testing revealed that the anomalies were due to chance, not to anything supernatural.'' I hope that clears everything up. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 19:24, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | |||