3,882
edits
SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Miles.oppenheimer: Difference between revisions
SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Miles.oppenheimer (edit)
Revision as of 21:03, December 11, 2008
, 15 years ago→Miles.oppenheimer (talk • contribs • edit count • RFA page): Passed. Shadowcrest, I know there is something you do to these so do it...
Shadowcrest (talk | contribs) (→Miles.oppenheimer (talk • contribs • edit count • RFA page): I r teh bipolar) |
(→Miles.oppenheimer (talk • contribs • edit count • RFA page): Passed. Shadowcrest, I know there is something you do to these so do it...) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''''Result''': Promoted to Sysop. [[User:Clarinet Hawk|Clarinet Hawk]] <small>([[User talk:Clarinet Hawk|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Clarinet Hawk|contributions]])</small> 01:03, 12 December 2008 (UTC)'' | |||
=== [[User:Miles.oppenheimer|Miles.oppenheimer]] ([[User talk:Miles.oppenheimer|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Miles.oppenheimer|contribs]] • [[Special:Editcount/Miles.oppenheimer|edit count]] • [[SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Miles.oppenheimer|RFA page]]) === | === [[User:Miles.oppenheimer|Miles.oppenheimer]] ([[User talk:Miles.oppenheimer|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Miles.oppenheimer|contribs]] • [[Special:Editcount/Miles.oppenheimer|edit count]] • [[SmashWiki:Requests for adminship/Miles.oppenheimer|RFA page]]) === | ||
| Line 89: | Line 90: | ||
*'''Neutral with a lean toward support.''' I'm reasonably certain that, based on what I've seen, Miles would make a competent administrator. He seems generally rational, level-headed, willing to compromise, etc., all good traits, and thus the "lean toward support." The only thing major thing that worries me is that, on the admittedly limited basis of some comments he's made on this RfA, he doesn't always seem to consider the implications of his words. For example, ''I'' personally see his "yet" comment for the joke that he seemingly intended it to be. I also understand what he ''meant'' when he disputed Kperfect's vote, but the fact is that perception often supersedes reality, particularly, I've found, on Wikis where semantics are often of paramount importance. Those kinds of offhand, seemingly innocuous remarks can have remarkably far-reaching consequences. As such, and because I don't feel I know Miles well enough to either fully support or fully oppose, it's a neutral vote from me. – [[User:Defiant Elements|<font color="black">Defiant Elements</font>]] [[user talk:Defiant Elements|<font color=black><small>''+talk''</small></font>]] 04:23, 30 November 2008 (UTC) | *'''Neutral with a lean toward support.''' I'm reasonably certain that, based on what I've seen, Miles would make a competent administrator. He seems generally rational, level-headed, willing to compromise, etc., all good traits, and thus the "lean toward support." The only thing major thing that worries me is that, on the admittedly limited basis of some comments he's made on this RfA, he doesn't always seem to consider the implications of his words. For example, ''I'' personally see his "yet" comment for the joke that he seemingly intended it to be. I also understand what he ''meant'' when he disputed Kperfect's vote, but the fact is that perception often supersedes reality, particularly, I've found, on Wikis where semantics are often of paramount importance. Those kinds of offhand, seemingly innocuous remarks can have remarkably far-reaching consequences. As such, and because I don't feel I know Miles well enough to either fully support or fully oppose, it's a neutral vote from me. – [[User:Defiant Elements|<font color="black">Defiant Elements</font>]] [[user talk:Defiant Elements|<font color=black><small>''+talk''</small></font>]] 04:23, 30 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
[[Category:Resolved RfAs]] | |||
[[Category:Accepted RfAs]] | |||