Talk:Power ranking: Difference between revisions

From SmashWiki, the Super Smash Bros. wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
We already have [[:Category:Power Rankings]]. We don't need this. Nominated for deletion. Thanks to whoever wrote it though, I didn't know there was a Midwest Power Rankings. -- [[User:Delphiki|Bean]] 00:18, March 2, 2007 (GMT)
We already have [[:Category:Power Rankings]]. We don't need this. Nominated for deletion. Thanks to whoever wrote it though, I didn't know there was a Midwest Power Rankings. -- [[User:Delphiki|Bean]] 00:18, March 2, 2007 (GMT)
: We should still have an article on Power Rankings in general. Category pages are not article pages. --[[User:Kirby King|<font color="red"><b><i>Kirby King</i></b></font>]] 20:07, March 2, 2007 (GMT)


== Well... ==
== Well... ==


I don't see the difference between this and past tier lists for example, or maybe I don't understand the definition of the category History.  What is supposed to be linked from the History page, because I'm not seeing any kind of trend?
I don't see the difference between this and past tier lists for example, or maybe I don't understand the definition of the category History.  What is supposed to be linked from the History page, because I'm not seeing any kind of trend?

Revision as of 15:07, March 2, 2007

We already have Category:Power Rankings. We don't need this. Nominated for deletion. Thanks to whoever wrote it though, I didn't know there was a Midwest Power Rankings. -- Bean 00:18, March 2, 2007 (GMT)

We should still have an article on Power Rankings in general. Category pages are not article pages. --Kirby King 20:07, March 2, 2007 (GMT)

Well...

I don't see the difference between this and past tier lists for example, or maybe I don't understand the definition of the category History. What is supposed to be linked from the History page, because I'm not seeing any kind of trend?