User talk:Defiant Elements/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

User talk:Defiant Elements/Archive 1 (view source)

Revision as of 20:16, December 23, 2008

2,420 bytes removed , 16 years ago

no edit summary

Anonymous user

208.120.25.41

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == With all due respect... ==
-With all due respect, I have a bit of a problem with you coming in here, reading up on what can only be a minute part of this entire controversy, and then criticizing the way it has been handled based on your position as a bureaucrat. Our sysops work tirelessly, through badgering, abuse, and personal attack, to keep this a clean, informative, and fun community. This particular controversy was admittedly not worked out as best as it could have, but you seem to be trying to undermine their competency, dedication, and ability by presuming that their 'victims' were not at fault sufficient to justify their punishment. The fact of the matter is, their initial infractions were not sufficient. It was the accompanying responses to the initial punishments that were despicable and deserving of the bans. Please refrain from vocal critique until you know and understand the entire picture. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 13:59, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
+With all due respect, I have a bit of a problem with you coming in here, reading up on what can only be a minute part of this entire controversy, and then criticizing the way it has been handled based on your position as a bureaucrat. Our sysops work tirelessly, through badgering, abuse, and personal aBITCHSLAPreement. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 19:07, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
-:A coupla things.  Not to bandy semantics with you, but I wasn't based my critique on my position as a Bureaucrat, I was basing it on personal experience from the perspective of an outsider.  On a related note, I purposefully made it clear that my post was made on the basis of what an "outsider" would see, and that context is vitally important to understanding my post; I'm well aware that I don't have the full picture; instead, I'm presenting the picture that an ''outsider'' would see.  I don't doubt that many of the sysops are excellent, nor do I doubt they take a lot of abuse; heck, I've been threatened with a lawsuit for banning someone as a Sysop because the ban was supported by CheckUser.  And it's not an attempt to undermine them either, though I can see with little difficulty why it might come off as such.  As I said, I have no stake in the success of this community, but I felt obligated to post because I saw a problem that had not, as far as I could tell, been thoroughly addressed elsewhere in the hopes that some good might come of it.  My post may come off as strident or rabble-rousing -- indeed, I expected people might think that -- but that was not my intention.  However, I presumed nothing.  Indeed, if you read my first post you'll see that I'm perfectly willing to entertain the notion that the bans themselves were justified, but the manner in which the sysops responded/handled themselves is at least as much, if not more of a problem than the bans.  In truth, I don't expect anything to come of my post, but I made the effort because I thought that perhaps it would give people something to think about.  [[User:Defiant Elements|Defiant Elements]] 18:13, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
-::In that case I would suppose we are in agreement. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 19:07, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 :::Agreement about...?  &ndash; [[User:Defiant Elements|<font color="black">Defiant Elements</font>]] 19:10, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 ::::The the manner in which this fiasco was handled was unfortunate. However, I would like to make something clear. We here at SmashWiki do not need to be rescued. We do not need direct intervention from administrators and bureaucrats from other wikis. We do not need your patronization. Your perspective may have assisted, and that was, I believe what you in particular were trying to do. However, we have good sysops and a good community. This isn't an unprecedented event; if anything, it has been blown way out of proportion and an argument could have been made for you and the other users from foreign wikias 'butting into our business'. It is, in fact, the opinion of the majority of active sysops that the permabans should be removed. We will settle this dispute ourselves. The bottom line is that the site is still up, we still have active contributing users goaled toward the continued excellence of the wiki, and it sites continues to serve the community. In the end, that is the only thing that matters, and there's no argument for the contrary. [[User:Semicolon|Semicolon]] ([[User talk:Semicolon|talk]]) 19:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)