Talk:Blaster (Falco)

No Merge: I think that they should have separate articles. --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 14:12, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Merge: There isn't enough article for each blaster JtM (talk) 15:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

No Merge Theres barely enough article for most special attacks and Blaster articles are among the biggest ones... - Hatake91 (talk) 19:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

No Merge. I agree with Hatake91. - Amycats2 (talk) 04:45, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

each special move needs its own page even lucas's and ness's IMO because they differ enough... Kperfekt722 (talk) 04:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Merge. Other than minor range/cosmetic issues, they are largely the same attack, much like all three Super Jump Punches, which were also merged.- Gargomon251 (talk) 04:52, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Also, Landmaster. And I see no reason the Reflectors shouldn't be merged either: Falco's is the only one that moves any different.- Gargomon251 (talk) 04:55, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Incorrect. Masahiro Sakurai has stated on the Smash Bros. DOJO!! that Wolf dodges a split second after his Reflector activates. Fox merely stuns the opponent on contact. MarioGalaxy (talk) 17:16, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Neutral I agree with both sides. While the Blasters of all three Star Fox characters all have the same name, they all have unique abilities.

Example:

• Fox - No stun, but racks up damage.
• Falco - Stun, as well as longer range than Fox's.
• Wolf - Stun, shortest range, and a bayonet attached to it that can cause damage.

I think that we should merge the articles in this format:

Blaster

General information about the Blaster.

Blaster (Fox)

Information about Fox's Blaster.

Blaster (Falco)

Information about Falco's Blaster.

Blaster (Wolf)

Information about Wolf's Blaster.

Basically stack each individual article. MarioGalaxy (talk) 17:24, 28 July 2008 (UTC)