Talk:Blaster (Falco): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
each special move needs its own page even lucas's and ness's IMO because they differ enough... [[User:Kperfekt722|Kperfekt722]] ([[User talk:Kperfekt722|talk]]) 04:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC) | each special move needs its own page even lucas's and ness's IMO because they differ enough... [[User:Kperfekt722|Kperfekt722]] ([[User talk:Kperfekt722|talk]]) 04:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
'''Merge'''. | |||
'''Merge'''. Other than minor range/cosmetic issues, they are largely the same attack, much like all three [[Super Jump Punch]]es, which were also merged.- [[User:Gargomon251|Gargomon251]] ([[User talk:Gargomon251|talk]]) 04:52, 22 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:53, July 21, 2008
No Merge: I think that they should have separate articles. --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 14:12, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Merge: There isn't enough article for each blaster JtM (talk) 15:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
No Merge Theres barely enough article for most special attacks and Blaster articles are among the biggest ones... - Hatake91 (talk) 19:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
No Merge. I agree with Hatake91. - Amycats2 (talk) 04:45, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
each special move needs its own page even lucas's and ness's IMO because they differ enough... Kperfekt722 (talk) 04:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Merge. Other than minor range/cosmetic issues, they are largely the same attack, much like all three Super Jump Punches, which were also merged.- Gargomon251 (talk) 04:52, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
