Talk:Lakitu & Spinies: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Spinies should be kept seperate as they are separate characters. That would be like merging Toad and Toadsworth. | Spinies should be kept seperate as they are separate characters. That would be like merging Toad and Toadsworth. | ||
MERGE Are you all kidding me?! I mean, really, without spinies, Lakitu is nothing! And without Lakitu aiming them, those slow moving Spinies wouldn't be a threat at all! | |||
Revision as of 09:13, July 31, 2009
EXTREMELY STRONG KEEP, only because spinys appear elsewhere in other games, are backround characters in previous ssb games, and because they continue to stay alive after/if you defeat lakitu. Kperfekt722 (talk) 07:25, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Merge. Without the Spinies, Lakitu is worthless. They always work in pairs, almost never apart. And the AT is no exception. There's not even enough notable info to make a separate article. This is just a duplicate of Lakitu. - Gargomon251 (talk) 08:37, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Merge The Spinys can't be there without Lakitu!Amycats2 (talk) 21:18, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Merge. if lakitu didn't exist, these wouldn't exist JtM =^] (talk) 14:43, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
amycats2 and jtm are both wrong, as they are backround characters as well, and in mario games, spiny's appear without lakitu. KP317 (talk) 21:21, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Spinies should be kept seperate as they are separate characters. That would be like merging Toad and Toadsworth.
MERGE Are you all kidding me?! I mean, really, without spinies, Lakitu is nothing! And without Lakitu aiming them, those slow moving Spinies wouldn't be a threat at all!
